安金彪,王文权,辛传奇. “双碳”驱动的地质储氢技术:潜力、瓶颈与创新[J]. 油气储运,2025,x(x):1−13.
引用本文: 安金彪,王文权,辛传奇. “双碳”驱动的地质储氢技术:潜力、瓶颈与创新[J]. 油气储运,2025,x(x):1−13.
AN Jinbiao, WANG Wenquan, XIN Chuanqi. A review of geological hydrogen storage driven by “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality”: potential, bottlenecks, and innovation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, x(x): 1−13.
Citation: AN Jinbiao, WANG Wenquan, XIN Chuanqi. A review of geological hydrogen storage driven by “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality”: potential, bottlenecks, and innovation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, x(x): 1−13.

“双碳”驱动的地质储氢技术:潜力、瓶颈与创新

A review of geological hydrogen storage driven by “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality”: potential, bottlenecks, and innovation

  • 摘要:
    目的 针对氢能大规模、长周期储能需求,聚焦地质储氢技术在全球能源转型背景下的技术潜力与发展路径,旨在构建覆盖技术评估、风险管控及产业化推进的全链条解决方案,为“双碳”目标下氢能产业链完善提供科学支撑。
    方法 通过整合全球典型地质储氢工程数据,建立多维度技术评价指标体系,系统梳理国内外地质储氢构造空间类型,分析地质储氢技术的发展历程与现状,归纳总结当前地质储氢技术的潜力与瓶颈,并展望未来地质储氢技术的重点发展方向。
    结果 ①地质储氢技术在氢能产业链中具有显著的协同效应,能够有效平衡氢能供需波动,降低跨区域调配成本,并适配交通、工业、发电等多场景需求;②地质储氢在需求端、资源端、经济端及安全端都展现出极大潜力,有望实现大规模地质储氢;③地质储氢面临地质完整性评价、井筒完整性检测与评价、氢与储层介质化学反应、储氢库地面注采技术、储氢库安全监测体系、储氢库长期稳定性评估等多种技术挑战,应加快相关理论技术攻关。
    结论 未来地质储氢可从技术创新、管理创新、商业模式及政策保障方面协同推进:①聚焦储层地质与工程体系优化,研发基于多物理场融合的井筒智能监测技术,建立数字孪生储气库系统以实现全生命周期预测预警;②促进氢能产业链上下游协同,构建标准化战略体系,制定分级标准与全生命周期质量控制规范,形成可复制推广的技术方案;③探索“氢储能收益权质押+区块链溯源”的金融创新,设计绿氢供应与储氢服务捆绑的一体化方案及“风光发电+地质储氢+调峰供电”的能源套餐;④构建技术创新支持体系,加速地质储氢设施及氢气管网建设,为氢能产业规模化发展奠定基础。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In response to the demand for large-scale and long-term storage of hydrogen energy, this paper focuses on the technical potential and development pathway of geological hydrogen storage (GHS) within the context of the global energy transition. The aim is to develop a full-chain solution that encompasses technology assessment, risk control, and the promotion of industrialization, thereby providing scientific support for enhancing the hydrogen energy industry chain in pursuit of the “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” goals.
    Methods The study utilized data from typical GHS facilities worldwide. A multi-dimensional technical evaluation indicator system was established, followed by a systematic analysis to examine the various types of structural spaces for GHS both domestically and internationally. Additionally, the study reviewed the development trajectory and current status of GHS, summarizing the potential and bottlenecks of existing methods. Furthermore, priorities for the future development of GHS were identified.
    Results ①GHS provides significant synergistic effects within the hydrogen energy industry chain, helping to mitigate fluctuations in hydrogen supply and demand while reducing cross-regional allocation costs. These advantages make this technology adaptable to various scenarios, including transportation, industry, and power generation. ②GHS demonstrates considerable potential in terms of demand, resource availability, economic benefits, and safety, indicating a promising outlook for large-scale applications. ③The development of GHS faces technical challenges in several areas, including geological integrity evaluation, wellbore integrity detection and evaluation, chemical reactions between hydrogen and the reservoir medium, surface injection and production technology for hydrogen storage, safety monitoring systems, and long-term stability evaluation. Therefore, accelerated efforts are essential to address the theoretical and technological challenges in these fields.
    Conclusion This study advocates for a coordinated approach in future efforts to promote GHS, focusing on technological innovation, management innovation, business models, and policy support, as detailed below: ①Priority should be given to optimizing reservoir geology evaluation and engineering systems, developing intelligent wellbore monitoring technology based on the integration of multiple physical fields, and establishing a digital twin gas storage system to facilitate full life-cycle prediction and warning. ②Collaboration between upstream and downstream entities across the hydrogen energy industry chain should be fostered through the establishment of a standardized strategic framework, the formulation of standards at various levels and full life-cycle quality control specifications, as well as the development of technical solutions that can be easily replicated. ③Efforts should focus on exploring the financial innovation of “GHS income right pledges accompanied by blockchain-based traceability”. Additionally, an integrated solution should be designed to bundle green hydrogen supply with hydrogen storage services, as well as an energy package that combines “wind and solar power generation, GHS, and peak-shaving power supply”. ④A technical innovation support system should be established, and the construction of GHS facilities and hydrogen pipeline networks should be expedited to lay the groundwork for the large-scale development of the hydrogen energy industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回