喻鹏飞,侯磊,王雪婷,等. 考虑地层压力动态变化的地下储气库注气方案优化[J]. 油气储运,2025,44(4):1−12.
引用本文: 喻鹏飞,侯磊,王雪婷,等. 考虑地层压力动态变化的地下储气库注气方案优化[J]. 油气储运,2025,44(4):1−12.
YU Pengfei, HOU Lei, WANG Xueting, et al. Optimization of gas injection scheme for underground gas storage considering dynamic changes in reservoir pressure[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, 44(4): 1−12.
Citation: YU Pengfei, HOU Lei, WANG Xueting, et al. Optimization of gas injection scheme for underground gas storage considering dynamic changes in reservoir pressure[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, 44(4): 1−12.

考虑地层压力动态变化的地下储气库注气方案优化

Optimization of gas injection scheme for underground gas storage considering dynamic changes in reservoir pressure

  • 摘要:
    目的 地下储气库作为天然气“产-供-储-销-用”产业链中的核心基础设施,对稳定天然气供应、平衡供需波动及保障应急供气具有重要意义。传统地下储气库运行策略因未充分利用历史数据且缺乏智能决策支持,导致主观性较强、注气能耗较高,因此地下储气库注气优化是确保其高效、安全运行的关键环节之一。
    方法 首先,结合地质开发资料与多周期注采运行数据,对地层压力与库容量、单井注气能力的关系进行拟合,构建地下储气库注气过程一体化动态压力计算方法,可动态更新注气各环节的压力计算结果,为目标函数计算与约束条件的设定提供关键的输入参数。其次,将注气井开井时间作为决策变量,以注气总能耗与井口油压稳定性为优化目标,在计划注气总量、注气期限等约束条件下,构建注气井开井时间优化方法。最后,采用多目标粒子群算法求解Pareto前沿解集,通过优劣解距离法综合评估各方案的经济性与安全性,确定最优开井时间分配方案及注气量。
    结果 针对某已建储气库,设定注气期限30 d、计划注气总量1 300×104 m3,优化后方案的注气总能耗为8.002×104 kW,井口油压标准差为1.712 MPa。与初始方案相比,总能耗降低51.6%,井口油压标准差降低81.6%,显著提升了经济性与安全性。
    结论 地下储气库注气过程一体化动态压力计算方法可全面协调地层、井筒及地面管网压力的动态变化关系,弥补了传统方法忽视地层压力动态变化的不足,为提高注气优化的科学性与实用性提供了可靠支持。未来研究应针对现场地质条件复杂或数据不完备的场景进行算法改进,推动地下储气库向高效、安全及智能化方向发展。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Underground gas storage (UGS) facilities are crucial infrastructures in the "production-supply-storage-sale-consumption" industry chain for natural gas. They play a significant role in stabilizing supply, balancing fluctuations in both supply and demand, and ensuring emergency gas supply. However, traditional operational strategies often lead to high energy consumption during gas injection, primarily due to their reliance on subjective decision-making, which fails to fully utilize historical data and lacks intelligent decision support. Therefore, optimizing gas injection into these underground storages is essential for maintaining their efficient and safe operation.
    Methods The correlations among reservoir pressures, storage capacities, and single-well gas injection capacities were established through fitting, with the utilization of geological development data and injection-production operational data collected over repeated cycles. An integrated dynamic pressure calculation method for the gas injection process in UGS facilities was developed, incorporating these established relationships. This method subsequently enabled the dynamic updating of pressure calculation results for each link of the gas injection process. For gas injection optimization, the updated pressure levels serve as key input parameters and dynamic boundary conditions for objective function calculation and constraints establishment. Then a gas injection optimization method was formulated, taking the time of open gas injection wells as the decision variable and the energy consumption for gas injection and wellhead oil pressure stability as the optimization objectives, while defining constraints such as the planned total gas injection volume and gas injection period. The Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization (MOPSO) algorithm was employed to solve the Pareto frontier solution set. The economic efficiency and safety of various solutions were comprehensively evaluated using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to identify the optimal open well schemes and gas injection volumes.
    Results The proposed method was utilized to formulate a gas injection scheme for an established gas storage facility, with the gas injection period and planned total gas injection volume set at 30 days and 1,300×104 m3, respectively. The corresponding total energy consumption for gas injection was 8.002×104 kW, while the standard deviation of wellhead oil pressure was 1.712 MPa. These results reflect reductions of 51.6% and 81.6%, respectively, compared to the initial scheme, underscoring the effectiveness of the optimization.
    Conclusion The integrated dynamic pressure calculation method for the gas injection process in UGS facilities allows for the comprehensive coordination of dynamically changing pressure relationships among reservoirs, wellbores, and surface pipeline networks. This approach effectively addresses the shortcomings of traditional methods that often overlook dynamic fluctuations in reservoir pressure and provides reliable support for enhancing the scientific rigor and practicality of gas injection optimization. Future research should focus on examining the dynamic coupling relationships among reservoir pressures, storage capacities, and single-well gas injection capacities, aiming for further improvement and optimization to address complex geological conditions or incomplete on-site data. Such efforts will promote advancements in underground gas storage facilities, leading to increased efficiency, safety, and intelligence.

     

/

返回文章
返回