姚志祥. 格拉管道防腐层再次检漏补漏实践[J]. 油气储运, 1996, 15(10): 28-31.
引用本文: 姚志祥. 格拉管道防腐层再次检漏补漏实践[J]. 油气储运, 1996, 15(10): 28-31.
Yao Zhixiang. The Second Leak Inspection and Repairing for Golmud-Lhasa Pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 1996, 15(10): 28-31.
Citation: Yao Zhixiang. The Second Leak Inspection and Repairing for Golmud-Lhasa Pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 1996, 15(10): 28-31.

格拉管道防腐层再次检漏补漏实践

The Second Leak Inspection and Repairing for Golmud-Lhasa Pipeline

  • 摘要: 格尔木至拉萨成品油管道已运行20 a, 由于自然环境恶劣、地质条件复杂及人为破坏, 致使管道防腐层损坏严重。格拉管道管理部门与施工单位一起经过4 a的时间, 耗资108万元, 对全线1 080 km输油管道的防腐层进行了第二次检漏、补漏施工, 共检测出14 236个管道防腐层破损漏点, 并在全部挖开后按标准重新制作防腐层。详细介绍了该工程的施工方法、施工技术、工程费用及管道防腐层损坏情况。分析防腐层损坏原因有: ①高浓度盐碱水浸泡; ②经日晒雨淋形成老化龟裂; ③青藏公路施工中工程机械在管道上反复压轧; ④原施工粗糙。该检漏、补漏工程恢复了格拉管道的技术性能, 为管道的科学管理和输油计划的制定提供了依据。

     

    Abstract: Having being in operation for 20 years, Golmud-Lhasa Products Pipeline suffered from grievous coating damages due to unfavorable environment, complex geology and artifacial destructive activities. In a period of four years and at a cost of 1.08 million RMB, the second leak inspection and repairing over the 1, 080 km pipeline was made, and 14, 236 leak points discovered, excavated and recoated per new specifications with construction method, techniques and expences as well as pipeline corrosion information described in detail. The following reasons for coating damages are introduced: ① soaking with salty water, ② wheathering, ③ repeatative rolling by construction machinery on Qinghai-Tibet Highway, and ④ poor coating quality. After leakage repairing, the pipeline performances were recovered, and scientific experiences provided for pipeline management and production planning.

     

/

返回文章
返回