郑伟, 焦旸, 杨建, 孙道华, 李珺. 火电厂绿氨掺烧场景下的液氨储运技术及经济性分析[J]. 油气储运. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.202503070093
引用本文: 郑伟, 焦旸, 杨建, 孙道华, 李珺. 火电厂绿氨掺烧场景下的液氨储运技术及经济性分析[J]. 油气储运. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.202503070093
ZHENG Wei, JIAO Yang, YANG Jian, SUN Daohua, LI Jun. Liquid ammonia storage and transportation technology and economic analysisin the green ammonia co-firing scenario of thermal power plants[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.202503070093
Citation: ZHENG Wei, JIAO Yang, YANG Jian, SUN Daohua, LI Jun. Liquid ammonia storage and transportation technology and economic analysisin the green ammonia co-firing scenario of thermal power plants[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.202503070093

火电厂绿氨掺烧场景下的液氨储运技术及经济性分析

Liquid ammonia storage and transportation technology and economic analysisin the green ammonia co-firing scenario of thermal power plants

  • 摘要: 目的氨是一种良好的零碳燃料,绿氨掺烧已成为我国火电厂低碳化改造建设的主要技术路径之一,既可有效解决火电厂降碳问题,又能很好解决风光等可再生能源大规模消纳及长周期储能问题,大规模、高效、经济、安全地储运液氨尤为重要。方法从氨的主要特性和氨储能两方面阐述了氨燃料的优缺点,详细介绍了液氨运输和储存方式。为改进现有液氨储存工艺,提出了一种中压常温与低压降温相组合的新型液氨储存方式,其充分兼顾两种储存方式的各自优点,具有节能、节水、安全性较高、投资费用适中的优势。以某燃煤火电厂2×660 MW机组掺烧10%(以热量计)绿氨工程为典型案例,给出了具体液氨储运技术方案以及主要设备设计参数选型,并对3种液氨储存方式进行了全面经济性对比分析。结果在火电厂绿氨掺烧场景下,管道运输具有经济性好、运输效率高、安全性高等显著优势,是当下最可行的大规模液氨运输方式。根据经济性分析结果并出于安全性考虑,中压常温与低压降温组合储存方式中,选取的中压常温球罐数量应合理且尽量少,宜为2~3个;研究发现液氨储存存在一个临界天数,本案例的临界天数为5天,当液氨储存天数大于临界天数时建议选用中压常温与低压降温组合储存方式,可以较好地兼顾经济性和安全性;而当液氨储存天数不大于临界天数时,3种储存方式的经济性相差不大,建议选用安全性更高的中压常温储存方式。结论目前亟需制定液氨管道输送相关国家标准,并加快推进火电厂绿氨掺烧示范工程建设工作,助力实现“碳达峰、碳中和”目标。

     

    Abstract: Objective Ammonia is a good zero carbon fuel, and green ammonia co-firing has become one of the main technological paths for low-carbon transformation and construction of thermal power plants in China. It can effectively solve the problems of carbon reduction in thermal power plants, as well as large-scale consumption and long-term energy storage of renewable energy such as wind and solar power. Replacing some coal or natural gas with green ammonia as fuel will require a large amount of green ammonia. It is particularly important to achieve large-scale, efficient, economical, and safe storage and transportation of liquid ammonia. Methods The advantages and disadvantages of ammonia fuel are elaborated from two perspectives: the main characteristics of ammonia and ammonia energy storage. Detailed introduction is given to the transportation and storage methods of liquid ammonia. To improve the existing liquid ammonia storage process, a new liquid ammonia storage method combining medium pressure room temperature and low pressure cooling has been proposed, which fully considers the advantages of both storage methods and has the advantages of energy saving, water saving, high safety, and moderate investment cost. Taking a typical case of a 2×660 MW coal-fired power plant co-firing 10% (by heat) green ammonia project, a specific liquid ammonia storage and transportation technology scheme and the selection of main equipment design parameters are provided, and a comprehensive economic comparative analysis is conducted on three types of liquid ammonia storage methods. Results In the scenario of green ammonia co-firing in thermal power plants, pipeline transportation has significant advantages such as good economy, high transportation efficiency, and high safety, and is currently the most feasible large-scale liquid ammonia transportation method. It is not suitable to use atmospheric and low-temperature storage for liquid ammonia storage. Based on the economic analysis results and safety considerations, the number of medium pressure and room temperature spherical tanks selected for the combination of medium pressure and low pressure cooling storage should be reasonable and as few as possible, preferably 2-3; The study found that there is a critical number of days for the storage of liquid ammonia, which is 5 days in this case. When the storage time of liquid ammonia is greater than the critical number, it is recommended to use a combination storage method of medium pressure room temperature and low pressure cooling, which can better balance economy and safety. However, when the storage time of liquid ammonia is not greater than the critical number, the economic efficiency of the three storage methods is not significantly different, and it is recommended to choose the medium pressure room temperature storage method with higher safety. Conclusion At present, it is urgent to formulate national standards for liquid ammonia pipeline transportation and accelerate the construction of green ammonia co-firing demonstration projects in thermal power plants, in order to help achieve China's goals of "carbon peak and carbon neutrality".

     

/

返回文章
返回