田望,陈心怡,任磊,等. 油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架构建[J]. 油气储运,2025,44(3):261−270. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.03.002
引用本文: 田望,陈心怡,任磊,等. 油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架构建[J]. 油气储运,2025,44(3):261−270. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.03.002
TIAN Wang, CHEN Xinyi, REN Lei, et al. Construction of methane emission management system framework for oil and gas storage and transportation companies[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, 44(3): 261−270. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.03.002
Citation: TIAN Wang, CHEN Xinyi, REN Lei, et al. Construction of methane emission management system framework for oil and gas storage and transportation companies[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, 44(3): 261−270. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.03.002

油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架构建

Construction of methane emission management system framework for oil and gas storage and transportation companies

  • 摘要:
    目的 油气储运企业将油气产业链的上游与下游串联起来,是开展甲烷减排工作的主力军,然而当前其甲烷排放管理体系尚不健全。为此,研究油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架,有助于进一步细化企业甲烷排放管控工作,贯彻落实《甲烷排放控制行动方案》,助力实现“双碳”目标。
    方法 从欧盟、美国以及中国油气行业的甲烷管控趋势出发,梳理欧美在政策导向、排放标准、企业责任、减排技术等方面的发展要求,分析油气储运企业进行甲烷排放管理的必要性。同时,选取8家北美、欧洲知名油气储运公司进行文件报告调研,从顶层设计、量化统计、检测维修、信息披露4个方面对比其甲烷排放管理经验,总结油气公司在体系顶层设计和管理细则方面的甲烷排放管理思路。
    结果 国际油气企业在法规的强制要求与油气行业组织的指导下,已逐步建立完善甲烷排放管理体系,形成明确的减排目标、组织架构及考核激励机制,未来工作重心放在排放监测量化方面;对比国际,中国油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系尚不成熟,甲烷控排工作缺少抓手,跨部门协作与激励机制不完善,减排主动性不足。
    结论 中国油气储运企业应参照国际甲烷排放管理体系的领先经验与优秀实践,从甲烷排放管理的顶层设计出发,以控排目标为导向,围绕量化统计、规划减排、评价审核、信息公开等过程环节压实责任分工,健全考核奖励机制,搭建油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架;编制运营过程中的排放量化方法,规范维检修工作流程,明确环境信息披露要求,充分考虑甲烷减排成本与效益,完善碳资产管理能力,从而实现甲烷管理与企业生产、安全、成本等管理协同发展。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Oil and gas storage and transportation companies play a crucial role in methane emission reduction by linking the upstream and downstream segments of the industry. However, their methane emission management systems remain inadequate. Therefore, studying the methane emission management system framework for oil and gas storage and transportation companies will enhance the precision of their emission control efforts, facilitate the implementation of the Methane Emissions Control Action Plan, and support the achievement of “dual carbon” goals.
    Methods The trends in methane control within the oil and gas industries of the EU, the United States, and China were reviewed, the development requirements of the EU and the United States regarding policy orientation, emission standards, corporate responsibility, emission reduction technology were examined, and the necessity of methane emission management for oil and gas storage and transportation companies was analyzed. Additionally, a document report investigation was conducted on eight prominent oil and gas companies in North America and Europe. Their methane emission management experience was compared across four aspects: top-level design, quantitative statistics, inspection and maintenance, and information disclosure. Key insights into their system design and management rules were also summarized.
    Results Under the mandatory requirements of laws and regulations and the guidance of oil and gas industry organizations, international oil and gas companies have gradually established and enhanced methane emission management systems, setting clear emission reduction targets, organizational structures, and assessment incentive mechanisms. Future efforts will focus on quantifying emission monitoring. In contrast, the methane emission management system for oil and gas storage and transportation companies in China remains underdeveloped, lacking effective control measures, robust cross-departmental cooperation, and sufficient incentives for emission reduction.
    Conclusion Oil and gas storage and transportation companies in China should adopt best practices from leading international methane emission management systems. They should focus on top-level design, using emission control targets as guidance, and clearly define responsibilities across quantitative statistics, planning, emission reduction, evaluation, review, and information disclosure processes. Enhancing the assessment and reward mechanisms is essential for building a robust methane emission management framework. Additionally, the companies should develop emission quantification methods, standardize maintenance workflows, clarify environmental information disclosure requirements, consider the cost-benefit of methane emission reduction, and improve carbon asset management capabilities to achieve coordinated development of methane management with production, safety, and cost management.

     

/

返回文章
返回