周照恒, 李玉星, 林敏, 郭宏帅, 王建夫. 盐穴储气库注采气井脖颈收缩原因及预防治理措施[J]. 油气储运, 2024, 43(11): 1313-1319. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.013
引用本文: 周照恒, 李玉星, 林敏, 郭宏帅, 王建夫. 盐穴储气库注采气井脖颈收缩原因及预防治理措施[J]. 油气储运, 2024, 43(11): 1313-1319. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.013
ZHOU Zhaoheng, LI Yuxing, LIN Min, GUO Hongshuai, WANG Jianfu. Study of causes for neck contraction of gas injection-production well in salt cavern gas storage and its preventive and remedial measures[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2024, 43(11): 1313-1319. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.013
Citation: ZHOU Zhaoheng, LI Yuxing, LIN Min, GUO Hongshuai, WANG Jianfu. Study of causes for neck contraction of gas injection-production well in salt cavern gas storage and its preventive and remedial measures[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2024, 43(11): 1313-1319. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.013

盐穴储气库注采气井脖颈收缩原因及预防治理措施

Study of causes for neck contraction of gas injection-production well in salt cavern gas storage and its preventive and remedial measures

  • 摘要:
    目的 2019年,在金坛盐穴储气库带压测腔施工过程中,发现有2个注采气井的脖颈收缩严重,与2013年的检测结果相比,体积收缩率分别达66%与72%。为避免脖颈继续收缩导致脖颈段通道堵塞,保障注采气的安全稳定运行,需开展腔体脖颈收缩原因研究,有针对性地提出预防及治理措施。
    方法 参考金坛盐穴储气库中2个腔体的生产运行数据、脖颈形状测量数据、地质条件、岩盐力学参数等资料,采用数值模拟分析、多臂井径仪测量、井下电视观察等手段对脖颈收缩原因进行研究。
    结果 2个腔体的生产运行情况均符合设计要求;数值模拟结果显示,在设计运行压力7~15 MPa范围内,脖颈半径的最大蠕变收缩量为7.62 mm,压力对脖颈收缩影响较小;多臂井径仪的测量结果与声呐测量数据基本相符,排除了测量出现误差的可能性;井下电视观察结果显示脖颈收缩处有大量盐结晶。
    结论 盐穴储气库按照设计压力运行,可有效避免蠕变所引起的脖颈收缩;脖颈收缩主要由盐结晶导致,盐结晶则主要由注采运行过程中凝析水附着在脖颈处引起岩盐重结晶导致。对此可采取优化监测手段及监测周期、优化脖颈段工艺设计、治理腔内残留卤水等手段对脖颈收缩进行预防,并可采用连续油管射流清洗技术进行脖颈堵塞治理。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Severe neck contraction was identified in two gas injection-production wells during the pressurized cavern testing at Jintan Salt Cavern Gas Storage in 2019. They experienced a remarkable volume reduction of 66% and 72%, respectively, compared to the testing results in 2013. To prevent potential blockages in the neck segments due to further contraction and ensure the continued safe and stable operation of these wells, it is crucial to explore the causes of cavern neck contraction and implement targeted preventive and remedial measures.
    Methods The study was based on extensive data gathered from the two caverns, encompassing information on production operation, neck shape measurements, local geological conditions, and mechanical parameters of the rock salt. Various methods were employed to investigate the factors behind neck contraction, such as numerical simulation analysis, multiarm caliper measurements, and downhole TV monitoring.
    Results The production and operation of the two caverns were found to align with the design specifications. According to numerical simulation results, the maximum creep contraction in the neck radius was 7.62 mm within the design pressure range of 7 to 15 MPa, with pressure demonstrating minimal impact on neck contraction. The results from the multiarm caliper measurements closely matched the sonar-derived data, effectively ruling out measurement errors. Downhole TV monitoring uncovered a significant presence of salt crystals at the site of neck contraction.
    Conclusion The operation of the salt cavern gas storage within the design pressure range proved effective in preventing neck contraction induced by creep. The main cause of neck contraction was attributed to salt crystallization, primarily triggered by the recrystallization of rock salt due to condensate water attaching to the neck during injection and production operations. Consequently, this paper introduces preventive measures, such as optimizing monitoring methods and cycles, refining the process design of neck segments, and addressing residual brine in the caverns. Additionally, the utilization of jet cleaning technology with coiled tubing is proposed as a remedial measure.

     

/

返回文章
返回