石彤, 刘啸奔, 张琳, 王军, 李睿, 谢婷, 冯庆善, 黄启玉. 管道IMU弯曲应变解算算法优化与全尺寸试验验证[J]. 油气储运, 2024, 43(11): 1269-1276. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.008
引用本文: 石彤, 刘啸奔, 张琳, 王军, 李睿, 谢婷, 冯庆善, 黄启玉. 管道IMU弯曲应变解算算法优化与全尺寸试验验证[J]. 油气储运, 2024, 43(11): 1269-1276. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.008
SHI Tong, LIU Xiaoben, ZHANG Lin, WANG Jun, LI Rui, Xie Ting, FENG Qingshan, HUANG Qiyu. Optimization of IMU-based bending strain solving algorithm and full-scale experimental validation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2024, 43(11): 1269-1276. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.008
Citation: SHI Tong, LIU Xiaoben, ZHANG Lin, WANG Jun, LI Rui, Xie Ting, FENG Qingshan, HUANG Qiyu. Optimization of IMU-based bending strain solving algorithm and full-scale experimental validation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2024, 43(11): 1269-1276. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.11.008

管道IMU弯曲应变解算算法优化与全尺寸试验验证

Optimization of IMU-based bending strain solving algorithm and full-scale experimental validation

  • 摘要:
    目的 基于惯性导航(Inertial Mapping Unit, IMU)内检测器的管道弯曲应变识别技术目前已被国内外广泛应用。IMU内检测器通过陀螺仪获取的俯仰角、航向角等进行解算并获取管道全线弯曲应变,由于内检测器实际运行时存在因自身尺寸等原因造成的检测轨迹线偏移,导致IMU检测弯曲应变与管道真实弯曲应变之间存在一定误差。
    方法 基于实际内检测器尺寸建立无异常振动等干扰的IMU内检测器仿真模型,构建管径508 mm管道不同弯曲应变条件下的仿真数据库,提出基于神经网络-决策树深度学习模型的解算优化算法,开展了误差分析与弯曲应变解算算法研究。开展全尺寸管道弯曲应变牵拉试验,验证解算优化算法的可行性与准确性。
    结果 随着管道弯曲应变增大,IMU内检测器检测弯曲应变与管道真实弯曲应变之间的误差随之增大。解算后弯曲应变数据的均方误差、误差协方差、误差标准差分别由0.007 0、0.004 9、0.070 2降低至0.001 2、0.001 6、0.012 6,而表示相关性的决定系数由0.443增至0.981。采用全尺寸牵拉试验验证该算法,弯曲应变与应变片检测真弯曲应变之间误差分别降低了79.6%、79.4%、76.0%。
    结论 通过有限元模拟与全尺寸牵拉试验数据验证了所提出解算优化算法的可行性与准确性,可为基于IMU内检测的管道真弯曲应变获取提供技术支撑与指导。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  The pipe bending strain identification technology based on an inertial mapping unit (IMU) in-line detector has seen extensive applications in China and abroad. IMUs obtain bending strains along entire pipelines through a solving process, using pitch angles and heading angles acquired by a gyroscope. However, deviations from the detection path may occur during the practical in-line detector operation, due to the sizes of IMUs and other factors, leading to inevitable errors between the bending strains identified by IMUs and the actual pipeline conditions.
    Methods A simulation model was developed for IMU in-line detectors based on their actual size, without abnormal vibrations and other interferences. In addition, a simulation database was created for pipelines with a diameter of 508 mm under varying bending strain conditions. Moreover, a solving algorithm optimized through an ANNExtraTree deep learning model was introduced. These tools were leveraged for error analysis and to delve into the bending strain solving algorithm. Furthermore, full-scale pulling experiments were conducted on pipeline bending strains, to verify the feasibility and accuracy of the optimized solving algorithm.
    Results  This study revealed that as pipeline bending strain increased, the errors between IMU detections and true bending strains grew. The mean square error, error covariance and error standard deviation of the bending strain data derived from the optimized solving process decreased from 0.007 0, 0.004 9, 0.070 2 to 0.001 2, 0.001 6, 0.012 6 respectively, while the coefficient of determination, indicating correlation, rose from 0.443 to 0.981. Furthermore, the full-scale pulling experiments conducted to validate the algorithm revealed substantial reductions in errors between bending strains computed by the optimized solving algorithm and those detected by a strain gauge at 79.6%, 79.4%, and 76.0%, respectively.
    Conclusion The proposed optimized solving algorithm is verified feasible and accurate through finite element simulations and full-scale pulling experiments. The study findings provide technical support and guidance for accurately identifying bending strains along pipelines based on IMU.

     

/

返回文章
返回