梁裕如, 何鹏, 韩建红, 胡耀强, 张成斌, 易冬蕊. YQ2井区增压集输方案多层次模糊评价优选[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(12): 1430-1437. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.009
引用本文: 梁裕如, 何鹏, 韩建红, 胡耀强, 张成斌, 易冬蕊. YQ2井区增压集输方案多层次模糊评价优选[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(12): 1430-1437. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.009
LIANG Yuru, HE Peng, HAN Jianhong, HU Yaoqiang, ZHANG Chengbin, YI Dongrui. Optimization of supercharged gathering scheme for YQ2 Wellblock by multi-level fuzzy evaluation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(12): 1430-1437. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.009
Citation: LIANG Yuru, HE Peng, HAN Jianhong, HU Yaoqiang, ZHANG Chengbin, YI Dongrui. Optimization of supercharged gathering scheme for YQ2 Wellblock by multi-level fuzzy evaluation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(12): 1430-1437. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.009

YQ2井区增压集输方案多层次模糊评价优选

Optimization of supercharged gathering scheme for YQ2 Wellblock by multi-level fuzzy evaluation

  • 摘要: 随着延安气田YQ2井区的持续开发,预计两年内该气田约有65.42%的气井井口压力不能满足进站压力要求,届时将无法保证井区稳产,亟需开展增压集输方案优选。通过对309口气井油压/套压变化规律的分析及增压时机的预测,依据天然气状态方程(Benedict-Webb-Rubin-Starling, BWRS)和四阶龙格-库塔方法,得到不同的增压设备位置和数量分布,形成5套增压集输方案。选取技术经济与安全两个一级评价指标,细化选取井口废弃压力、管网压损、总投资等7个二级评价指标,通过层次分析(Analytic Hierarchy Process, AHP)法确定各指标权重,进而运用模糊评价法对5套增压集输方案进行评价优选,最终确定采用末站集中增压+12站区域增压方案。研究结果对气田高效开发、降本增效、有效降低井口废弃压力、最大限度发挥增压稳产设备的效用具有重要意义。

     

    Abstract: With the continuous development of YQ2 Wellblock, it is estimated that there will be about 65.42% of gas wells whose wellhead pressure cannot reach the required inlet pressure within two years, and then, the wellblock cannot be maintained at stable production. Thus, it is urgent to conduct the research on optimization of supercharged gathering scheme. Herein, 5 supercharged gathering schemes were developed based on the different locations and quantity of supercharging equipment, which were determined according to the Benedict-Webb-Rubin-Starling (BWRS) Equation and the Fourth Order Runge-Kutta Method, through the analysis on change laws of oil/casing pressure in 309 wells and the prediction of supercharging time. Then, comparison was made among the 5 supercharged gathering schemes through fuzzy evaluation using the two primary evaluation indicators of technical economy and safety, refining the seven secondary evaluation indicators, such as the wellhead abandonment pressure, pressure loss of pipeline network and total investment, and determining their weights with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Finally, it was determined to adopt the scheme of centralized supercharging at the terminal station + regional supercharging at 12 stations. In general, the research results are of great significance to the efficient development of gas field, cost reducing and benefit increasing, effective reduction of wellhead abandonment pressure, and the maximization of effectiveness of supercharging equipment for stable production.

     

/

返回文章
返回