方威伦, 张宏, 杨悦, 杨洪, 高辉, 刘啸奔. 基于3D扫描的平滑凹陷管道应变解析计算方法[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(12): 1422-1429. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.008
引用本文: 方威伦, 张宏, 杨悦, 杨洪, 高辉, 刘啸奔. 基于3D扫描的平滑凹陷管道应变解析计算方法[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(12): 1422-1429. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.008
FANG Weilun, ZHANG Hong, YANG Yue, YANG Hong, GAO Hui, LIU Xiaoben. Analytical calculation method for strain of pipeline with smooth dent based on 3D scanning[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(12): 1422-1429. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.008
Citation: FANG Weilun, ZHANG Hong, YANG Yue, YANG Hong, GAO Hui, LIU Xiaoben. Analytical calculation method for strain of pipeline with smooth dent based on 3D scanning[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(12): 1422-1429. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.12.008

基于3D扫描的平滑凹陷管道应变解析计算方法

Analytical calculation method for strain of pipeline with smooth dent based on 3D scanning

  • 摘要: 基于凹陷应变的评价准则因其准确性高、适用性强的优势,在埋地长输管道凹陷适用性评价中得到广泛应用。为获得更为精确的凹陷应变值,提出了一种基于3D扫描轮廓的平滑凹陷管道应变解析计算方法。利用逆向工程软件对扫描点云数据进行预处理,采用三次B样条插值函数重构平滑凹陷曲面,通过数据格栅化将点云数据划分为规则化网格节点坐标数据;基于薄壳理论和几何变形分析推导了管道凹陷变形后各点的位移和应变,并将计算结果与有限元法、ASME B31.8公式计算结果进行对比,结果表明:所提出的解析算法和ASME B31.8公式计算得到的内壁最大等效应变结果与有限元法计算结果相比平均相对误差分别为17.59%、11.56%,外壁最大等效应变结果平均相对误差分别为7.73%、13.16%,该解析算法对于凹陷外壁的应变计算比ASME B31.8公式更准确。研究成果可为含凹陷管道现场适用性评价提供理论基础。

     

    Abstract: Due to its advantages of high accuracy and strong applicability, the evaluation criteria based on dent strain is widely used to evaluate the applicability of buried long-distance pipelines with dents. In order to obtain the more accurate strain value of dent, an analytical calculation method was proposed for strain of pipelines with smooth dents based on 3D scanning profile. Specifically, the scanned point cloud data were pre-processed with the reverse engineering software, the smooth dent surface was reconstructed with the cubic B-spline interpolation function, and the point cloud data were divided into the regular grid node coordinates through data gridding. Besides, the displacement and strain of each node after dent deformation were derived based on the thin shell theory and geometrical deformation analysis, with the calculation results compared with that obtained by the finite element method and formula from ASME B31.8.According to the results, the average relative errors of maximum equivalent strain results of inner wall calculated by the proposed analytical calculation method, and formula from ASME B31.8 compared with FEA method are 17.59% and 11.56%, while that of the outer wall are 7.73% and 13.16%, respectively. Hence, the analytical calculation method is more accurate for strain calculation of the outer wall of dent than formula from ASME B31.8. In general, the research results could provide theoretical basis for the field applicability evaluation of pipelines with dents.

     

/

返回文章
返回