吕家兴, 侯磊, 王昕, 王玉江, 刘芳媛. 超临界CO2管道输送管径技术经济性评价[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(1): 114-120. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016
引用本文: 吕家兴, 侯磊, 王昕, 王玉江, 刘芳媛. 超临界CO2管道输送管径技术经济性评价[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(1): 114-120. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016
LYU Jiaxing, HOU Lei, WANG Xin, WANG Yujiang, LIU Fangyuan. Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(1): 114-120. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016
Citation: LYU Jiaxing, HOU Lei, WANG Xin, WANG Yujiang, LIU Fangyuan. Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(1): 114-120. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.01.016

超临界CO2管道输送管径技术经济性评价

Economic evaluation on diameter selection of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation

  • 摘要: CO2输送作为大规模碳捕集、利用与封存工程建设的中间环节,其首选方法是管道输送。CO2管道输送经济性评价模型是评价其投资回报、优化管输参数的依据。通过对比分析CO2管径计算公式,建立经济性评价模型,基于超临界CO2管道工程案例,对管道直径进行经济评价。结果表明:超临界CO2管道单位运输成本随管径的增大先下降后增加,对于输量为1×106t/a、长度为200km的管道,其管径为240mm时CO2单位运输成本最低;Vandeginste管径模型的计算结果与理论最优管径相近,推荐在实际工程中应用该模型;公称直径为200mm时所节约的管道费用远大于能耗成本的增量,年化费用最小;单位运输成本随着运输距离的增加而降低,200km后趋于稳定。研究结果可为CO2管道经济输送提供科学依据及决策参考。

     

    Abstract: For CO2 transportation, as an intermediate link in the construction of large-scale carbon capture, utilization and storage projects, pipeline transportation is the preferred. Therefore, the economic evaluation model of CO2 pipeline transportation is the basis for evaluating its return on investment and optimizing the parameters of pipeline transportation. By comparing and analyzing the calculation formula of CO2 pipeline diameter, an economic evaluation model was established and thereby, the economic evaluation of pipeline diameter was performed based on a case of supercritical CO2 pipeline engineering. The results show that the unit cost of supercritical CO2 pipeline transportation decreases first and then increases with the increase of the pipeline diameter. For the pipeline with a transport capacity of 1×106 t/a and a length of 200 km, the unit transportation cost of CO2 is the lowest at the pipeline diameter of 240 mm. Since the calculation result of the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is close to the theoretical optimal pipeline diameter, the Vandeginste pipeline diameter formula is recommended for the calculation of the pipeline diameter in the actual projects. However, the pipeline cost saved at a nominal diameter of 200 mm is far greater than the increment of energy consumption, and thus the annual cost in this case is the minimum. In addition, the unit transportation cost decreases with the increase of transportation distance, and the unit cost trends to be stable when the distance is longer than 200 km. Therefore, the research results could provide scientific basis and reference for the decision-making concerning the economic pipeline transportation of CO2.

     

/

返回文章
返回