田顺佳, 戚有龙, 冯春辉, 张金亚, 李振林. 不同整流器对超声波流量计计量的影响[J]. 油气储运, 2021, 40(7): 780-790. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.07.009
引用本文: 田顺佳, 戚有龙, 冯春辉, 张金亚, 李振林. 不同整流器对超声波流量计计量的影响[J]. 油气储运, 2021, 40(7): 780-790. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.07.009
TIAN Shunjia, QI Youlong, FENG Chunhui, ZHANG Jinya, LI Zhenlin. Influence law of different rectifiers on measurement of ultrasonic flowmeters[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(7): 780-790. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.07.009
Citation: TIAN Shunjia, QI Youlong, FENG Chunhui, ZHANG Jinya, LI Zhenlin. Influence law of different rectifiers on measurement of ultrasonic flowmeters[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(7): 780-790. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.07.009

不同整流器对超声波流量计计量的影响

Influence law of different rectifiers on measurement of ultrasonic flowmeters

  • 摘要: 为了探究超声波流量计在不同整流器下的计量规律,建立了含有整流器的检定管路模型,利用Fluent软件对不同整流器的管道流场进行数值模拟,得到对应超声波流量计的示值误差。同时,基于流量计现场应用声道数据,验证了数值模拟方法的准确性。利用数值模拟方法,选取3种类型的整流器与A、B、C 3种声道布置的超声波流量计,通过管道内的流场分布及流量计处截面的速度分布,分析整流器对超声波流量计计量产生差异的原因。结果表明:3种整流器对不同类型的超声波流量计产生的示值误差不同,对A类型超声波流量计的示值误差最大为0.5%左右,最小为0.2%左右;对B类型超声波流量计的示值误差最大为0.1%左右,最小为0.05%左右;对C类型超声波流量计的示值误差最大为0.4%左右,最小为0.2%左右。基于分析结果对超声波流量计的安装和检定提出了建议,对提高流量计的标定质量具有指导意义。

     

    Abstract: In order to explore the measurement law of ultrasonic flowmeters under different rectifiers, a calibration pipeline model with rectifiers was established, the flow field of pipelines with different rectifiers was numerically simulated by Fluent software, and the indication errors of the ultrasonic flowmeters were obtained. Meanwhile, the accuracy of the numerical simulation method was verified based on the filed application data of flowmeters. The three types of rectifiers and ultrasonic flowmeters arranged on A, B and C channels were selected with the numerical simulation method, and the reasons for the measurement variations of ultrasonic flowmeters caused by the rectifiers were analyzed through the flow field distribution in the pipeline and the velocity distribution in the cross section at the flowmeter. The results show that different indication errors of different types of ultrasonic flowmeter are resulted from the three types of rectifiers. Specifically, the maximum and minimum differences of indication error for type A ultrasonic flowmeter are about 0.5% and 0.2%, that for type B ultrasonic flowmeter are about 0.1% and 0.05%, and that for type C ultrasonic flowmeter are about 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively. Base on that, suggestions are put forward for the installation and verification of ultrasonic flowmeters, which have guiding significance for improving the calibration quality of flowmeters.

     

/

返回文章
返回