朱汪友, 周莹. 基于BP-SVM融合器算法的光纤预警振源识别方法[J]. 油气储运, 2021, 40(5): 527-532. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.05.007
引用本文: 朱汪友, 周莹. 基于BP-SVM融合器算法的光纤预警振源识别方法[J]. 油气储运, 2021, 40(5): 527-532. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.05.007
ZHU Wangyou, ZHOU Ying. Vibration source recognition method of optical fiber pre-warning based on BP-SVM fusion algorithm[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(5): 527-532. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.05.007
Citation: ZHU Wangyou, ZHOU Ying. Vibration source recognition method of optical fiber pre-warning based on BP-SVM fusion algorithm[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(5): 527-532. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.05.007

基于BP-SVM融合器算法的光纤预警振源识别方法

Vibration source recognition method of optical fiber pre-warning based on BP-SVM fusion algorithm

  • 摘要: 对油气管道附近振源的快速识别是保障管道安全的重要技术手段。现有的单一机器学习算法在不同运用场景所反映的监测性能差异较大,且不同学习算法在分类识别上又具有互补性,提出了基于BP-SVM融合器分类算法。该算法基于ϕ-OTDR系统分别采集了人工敲击、车辆通行、机械施工及火车通行4种振动源的振动信号,构建了四维度特征空间,作为机器学习的特征向量。将该算法应用于国家管网集团华北公司汉沽—武清段成品油管道进行现场振动信号识别,并对BP神经网络分类器、SVM分类器以及基于BP-SVM融合分类器的测试进行对比,结果表明:BP神经网络分类器、SVM分类器及BP-SVM融合分类器的识别率分别为75.2%、68.5%、81.4%,融合分类器性能明显优于单个分类器。

     

    Abstract: The rapid identification of vibration sources near the oil and gas pipelines is an important technical means to ensure the safety of pipelines. As the existing single machine learning algorithms varied greatly in the monitoring performance in different application scenarios, and different learning algorithms were complementary in classification and recognition, a classification algorithm based on BP-SVM fusion was proposed. Based on the ϕ-OTDR system, the vibration signals of four different vibration sources, i.e. manual knocking, vehicle passing, mechanical construction and train passing, were collected, and a four-dimensional feature space was constructed as the feature vector of machine learning. The algorithm was applied in Hangu–Wuqing Product Oil Pipeline of North China Branch of China Oil & Gas Pipeline Network Corporation for recognition of site vibration signals, and the test results show that, the recognition rates of BP neural network classifier, SVM classifier and BP-SVM fusion classifier are 75.2%, 68.5% and 81.4% respectively, indicating that the performance of fusion classifier is obviously better than that of a single classifier.

     

/

返回文章
返回