ASME PCC-2-2011 复合材料修复设计适用性及试验验证[J]. 油气储运, 2018, 37(4): 449-453. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.04.014
引用本文: ASME PCC-2-2011 复合材料修复设计适用性及试验验证[J]. 油气储运, 2018, 37(4): 449-453. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.04.014
Applicability analysis and experimental validation of ASME PCC-2-2011 composite repair system design methodology[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(4): 449-453. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.04.014
Citation: Applicability analysis and experimental validation of ASME PCC-2-2011 composite repair system design methodology[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(4): 449-453. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.04.014

ASME PCC-2-2011 复合材料修复设计适用性及试验验证

Applicability analysis and experimental validation of ASME PCC-2-2011 composite repair system design methodology

  • 摘要: 为了更加合理地对含缺陷管道进行修复设计,需要对修复设计方法的适用性和准确程度进 行分析。在ASME PCC-2-2011《压力设备和管道的检修》中,基于“基底管壁不屈服”“基底管壁屈 服”“缠绕层许用应变”假设,提出了3 种修复设计方法。基于力学解析分析,研究了3 种修复层厚 度计算方法与设计压力的相关性。设计、加工了深厚比约0.7 的窄缝型和半椭球型缺陷,分别采用3 种设计方法,在不同目标设计压力下计算了复合材料修复层厚度,分析了修复层厚度对于设计压力 的敏感性。研究表明:“基底管壁不屈服”的修复方法对设计压力极为敏感,而“缠绕层许用应变”方 法偏于保守,“基底管壁屈服”方法最适用于修复设计。(图4,表1,参20)

     

    Abstract: In order to conduct repair design of defect pipelines more rationally, it is necessary to analyze the applicability and accuracy of repair design methods. In “Repair of Pressure Equipment and Piping (ASME PCC-2-2011)”, three repair design methods are put forward based on three assumptions, i.e., “underlying substrate does not yield”, “underlying substrate yields” and “repair laminate allowable strains”. In this paper, the correlations between three repair thickness calculation methods and the design pressure were investigated based on mechanical analysis. Then, crack-like defect with depth/thickness ratio of 70% and semi-elliptic defect were designed and prepared. Finally, the repair thickness of composite materials was calculated under different design pressures by means of three design methods, and the sensitivity of repair thickness to design pressure was analyzed. It is indicated that the repair method based on the assumption of “underlying substrate does not yield” is extremely sensitive to design pressure, the method based on “repair laminate allowable strains” is relatively conservative and the one based on “underlying substrate yields” is the most applicable to repair design. (4 Figures, 1 Table, 20 References)

     

/

返回文章
返回