王俊强, 何仁洋, 刘哲, 郭晗. 中美油气管道完整性管理规范发展现状及差异[J]. 油气储运, 2018, 37(1): 6-14. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.01.002
引用本文: 王俊强, 何仁洋, 刘哲, 郭晗. 中美油气管道完整性管理规范发展现状及差异[J]. 油气储运, 2018, 37(1): 6-14. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.01.002
WANG Junqiang, HE Renyang, LIU Zhe, GUO Han. Development status of oil & gas pipeline integrity management specification in China and the USA and their differences[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(1): 6-14. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.01.002
Citation: WANG Junqiang, HE Renyang, LIU Zhe, GUO Han. Development status of oil & gas pipeline integrity management specification in China and the USA and their differences[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2018, 37(1): 6-14. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2018.01.002

中美油气管道完整性管理规范发展现状及差异

Development status of oil & gas pipeline integrity management specification in China and the USA and their differences

  • 摘要: 中国油气管道建设发展迅猛,加快油气管道完整性管理标准规范的体系建设势在必行,而美国油气管道完整性管理法规标准体系较为完备。采用对比分析方法,总结了中美油气管道完整性管理的发展现状,重点分析了中美油气管道法律法规标准有关基线评估、高后果区识别、完整性评价、维修维护等关键技术条款的特点及差异,提出了当前中国油气管道完整性管理在标准体系、监管、技术应用等方面存在的问题和发展方向。研究结果表明:美国已将完整性评价最低要求扩展至中后果区,冲击水压试验和超声导波探伤已列入油气管道完整性评价技术体系;中国提出了在役油气管道压力试验的新要求。今后可借鉴美国油气管道完整性管理的技术体系和先进理念,依托油气管道隐患治理工作,建立适合中国国情的油气管道完整性管理规范体系和政府监管体系。

     

    Abstract: The construction of oil & gas pipelines develops very quickly in China and it is necessary to expedite the construction of pipeline integrity management specification system. The pipeline integrity management law and standard system is relatively complete in the USA, so the development status and common grounds of pipeline integrity management in China and the USA were reviewed by means of the comparative analysis method. Then, the characteristics and differences of both countries' key oil and gas pipeline technical terms were analyzed in detail, such as baseline assessment, high consequence area identification, integrity assessment and maintenance. And finally, existing problems and future development direction of China's current oil and gas pipeline integrity management were pointed out from the aspects of standard system, supervision and technology application. It is indicated that in the USA, the minimum requirements of integrity assessment has been extended to the middle consequence areas and hydrostatic test and ultrasonic guided wave defect detection have been included in the oil and gas pipeline integrity assessment technology system. And in China, new requirements on in-service oil and gas pipeline pressure test are proposed. China shall learn from the USA about its technology systems and advanced concepts of oil and gas pipeline integrity management to establish the suitable pipeline integrity management specification system and government supervision system in China with the help of oil and gas pipeline risk control.

     

/

返回文章
返回