温凯, 何蕾, 虞维超, 宫敬, 陈树仁. 枯竭油气藏型储气库地层压力的计算方法[J]. 油气储运, 2017, 36(7): 781-788. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2017.07.006
引用本文: 温凯, 何蕾, 虞维超, 宫敬, 陈树仁. 枯竭油气藏型储气库地层压力的计算方法[J]. 油气储运, 2017, 36(7): 781-788. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2017.07.006
WEN Kai, HE Lei, YU Weichao, GONG Jing, CHEN Shuren. Calculation methods on formation pressure of underground gas storage rebuilt from depleted oil and gas reservoir[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(7): 781-788. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2017.07.006
Citation: WEN Kai, HE Lei, YU Weichao, GONG Jing, CHEN Shuren. Calculation methods on formation pressure of underground gas storage rebuilt from depleted oil and gas reservoir[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(7): 781-788. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2017.07.006

枯竭油气藏型储气库地层压力的计算方法

Calculation methods on formation pressure of underground gas storage rebuilt from depleted oil and gas reservoir

  • 摘要: 储层压力的动态变化是影响储气库注采能力的关键环节。为了研究储气库注采过程中地层压力随库容量的动态变化关系,结合生产数据和物质平衡原理,建立了3种评价储气库地层压力随库容量动态变化的快速计算方法,即生产数据拟合法、定容法及动态计算法。利用3种方法对储气库的地层压力随库容量的变化及地层压力在一个动态注采周期的变化进行计算,同时比较分析了定容法和动态计算法对储气库地层压力预测结果产生差异的原因,在此基础上对储气库注、采气量波动及注采周期对储气库地层压力的影响进行了敏感性分析。结果表明:3种方法都可以用于对储气库地层压力变化的动态预测,方法1的准确性依赖于生产数据的获取及生产数据变化趋势分析;方法2适用于边水、油环的变化可以忽略的储气库地层压力预测;方法3适用于对多种类型的储气库进行地层压力预测,但需要的地层参数相对较多。地层压力受日注采气量波动影响较小,受注采周期的影响较大。

     

    Abstract: The dynamic change of reservoir pressure is the key factor that influences the injection and production capacity of underground gas storage (UGS). In order to study the dynamic change relationship between formation pressure and storage capacity in the process of UGS injection and production, three fast calculation methods (i.e., production data fitting method, constant volume method and dynamic calculation method) were established according to production data and material balance principle to evaluate the dynamic change of UGS formation pressure with its storage capacity. Then, three methods were used to calculate the change of UGS formation pressure with the storage capacity, as well as the variation of formation pressure during one dynamic injection-production cycle. Besides, the reasons for the difference between constant volume method and dynamic calculation method in terms of predicted UGS formation pressure were analyzed. Finally, sensitivity analysis was performed on the effect of injection rate fluctuation, production rate fluctuation and production-injection cycle on the UGS formation pressure. It is shown that all the three methods can be used for the dynamic prediction of UGS formation pressure change. The accuracy of the production data fitting method depends on the production data acquisition and change trend analysis. The constant volume method is applicable to predict the formation pressure of UGSs whose edge water and oil rim change are negligible. The dynamic calculation method is applicable to various UGSs for formation pressure prediction, but more formation parameters are needed. It is indicated that the formation pressure is influenced less by the fluctuation of daily gas injection and production rate, but more by the injection-production cycle.

     

/

返回文章
返回