康凤立, 孙海峰, 熊亚选, 邓展飞, 刘蓉. 浸没燃烧式LNG气化器水浴气化传热计算[J]. 油气储运, 2016, 35(4): 406-411. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.04.011
引用本文: 康凤立, 孙海峰, 熊亚选, 邓展飞, 刘蓉. 浸没燃烧式LNG气化器水浴气化传热计算[J]. 油气储运, 2016, 35(4): 406-411. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.04.011
KANG Fengli, SUN Haifeng, XIONG Yaxuan, DENG Zhanfei, LIU Rong. Computation of heat transfer in water bath of LNG SCV[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2016, 35(4): 406-411. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.04.011
Citation: KANG Fengli, SUN Haifeng, XIONG Yaxuan, DENG Zhanfei, LIU Rong. Computation of heat transfer in water bath of LNG SCV[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2016, 35(4): 406-411. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.04.011

浸没燃烧式LNG气化器水浴气化传热计算

Computation of heat transfer in water bath of LNG SCV

  • 摘要: 为了研究SCV液化天然气气化器水浴内复杂的两相流传热规律,简化SCV气化器的工程应用计算方法,利用传热学理论,通过忽略烟气对传热过程的影响,简化了传热管束外流体流场、换热管内的温度场和流场,建立了水浴加热-液化天然气气化传热过程的数学模型。将实际运行中的浸没燃烧式液化天然气气化器的工作性能参数带入新建数学模型,计算得到了管外平均对流传热系数、总传热系数、总换热管长、总换热面积,同时根据SCV气化器的加热负荷、管外测量水流速度等反算上述数学模型中的4个参数值,结果表明:管外平均传热系数的模型计算结果与实际运行参数的偏差为16.8%,但总传热系数、总换热管长、总换热面积的偏差仅为6.9%、—7.9%以及—7.9%,总体上可满足工程计算的需要,验证了所建数学模型的可靠性。

     

    Abstract: In order to study the complicated two-phase flow heat transfer process in water bath of liquefied natural gas (LNG) submerged combustion vaporizer (SCV), and simplify the computation of LNG SCV in engineering application, a mathematical model for water bath and LNG vaporization was established after theoretical analysis, based on the theory of heat transfer. This model ignores the effect of flue gas, and simplifies flow field outside the heat transfer tube bundle and temperature and flow fields inside the heat exchange tube bundle. With the new model, actual operational parameters of a LNG SCV were used to calculate the average heat transfer coefficient outside the tube bundle, total heat transfer coefficient, total length and total heat-transfer area of the tube. Then, the derived four parameters were back-calculated depending on heating load and measured water flow velocity outside the tube of the LNG SCV. The results show a deviation of 16.8% between the average heat transfer coefficient outside the tube bundle calculated with this model and the actual parameter. However, deviations in total heat transfer coefficient, total tube length and total heat transfer area are only 6.9%, —7.9% and —7.9%, respectively. Generally, these deviations can meet the demands in engineering calculation. In addition, these results validate the reliability of the model proposed.

     

/

返回文章
返回