黄海亮, 焦光伟, 王亚超, 聂桐. IAHP确定滑坡对油库危险性指标权重及软件开发[J]. 油气储运, 2016, 35(2): 140-144. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.02.004
引用本文: 黄海亮, 焦光伟, 王亚超, 聂桐. IAHP确定滑坡对油库危险性指标权重及软件开发[J]. 油气储运, 2016, 35(2): 140-144. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.02.004
HUANG Hailiang, JIAO Guangwei, WANG Yachao, NIE Tong. Weight of landslide in risk assessment of oil tankfarm determined by IAHP and relevant software development[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2016, 35(2): 140-144. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.02.004
Citation: HUANG Hailiang, JIAO Guangwei, WANG Yachao, NIE Tong. Weight of landslide in risk assessment of oil tankfarm determined by IAHP and relevant software development[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2016, 35(2): 140-144. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.02.004

IAHP确定滑坡对油库危险性指标权重及软件开发

Weight of landslide in risk assessment of oil tankfarm determined by IAHP and relevant software development

  • 摘要: 将改进的层次分析法(IAHP) 引入滑坡对油库危险性评价指标权重确定中, 用三标度法代替传统的九标度法, 利用最优传递矩阵对判断矩阵进行处理, 从而使权重计算不需进行传统层次分析法的一致性检验, 大大提高了收敛速率。利用Visual Studio C# 2010软件进行了可视化改进的层次分析法软件开发。根据国内外相关研究文献和实地调查, 选取滑坡对油库危险性评价较为重要的10个指标进行权重确定, 得到了指标权重排序, 并与模糊层次分析法(FAHP)计算结果进行对比分析, 结果显示, 利用IAHP与FAHP两种方法计算指标权重所得各指标权重数值不一, 但计算所得权重排序一致, 证明该方法在滑坡对油库危险性指标权重确定中具有一定意义。

     

    Abstract: Improved analytic hierarchy process (IAHP) is introduced into determination of weight of landslide in risk assessment of oil tankfarm. Moreover, the three-demarcation method is deployed to replace the conventional ninedemarcation method, and the optimal transfer matrix is used to process the judgment matrix to eliminate the consistency check required by conventional hierarchy processes to determine the specific weight. In this way, convergence rate can be enhanced significantly. Additionally, Visual Studio C# 2010 is used for visualized IAHP software development. With references to domestic and overseas research documents and on-site investigation results, 10 indexes in risk assessment are chosen to determine the weights of landslip and the priority of specific index weights. The resulting priority is compared with the calculation results of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Relevant results show that weights determined by IAHP and FAHP methods may vary in values, but the priorities are identical. It can be seen that the method may provide some guidance to determine the weight of landslide in risk assessment of the oil tankfarm.

     

/

返回文章
返回