高喆慧, 帅健, 张思弘. 管道焊缝缺陷的定量安全评定与容限尺寸[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(5): 488-492, 496. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.05.006
引用本文: 高喆慧, 帅健, 张思弘. 管道焊缝缺陷的定量安全评定与容限尺寸[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(5): 488-492, 496. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.05.006
GAO Zhehui, SHUAI Jian, ZHANG Sihong. Quantitative safety assessment and tolerance size of pipeline weld defects[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(5): 488-492, 496. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.05.006
Citation: GAO Zhehui, SHUAI Jian, ZHANG Sihong. Quantitative safety assessment and tolerance size of pipeline weld defects[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(5): 488-492, 496. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.05.006

管道焊缝缺陷的定量安全评定与容限尺寸

Quantitative safety assessment and tolerance size of pipeline weld defects

  • 摘要: 目前, 焊缝缺陷已经成为影响老管道运行的重大安全隐患。某一老龄管道环焊缝、螺旋焊缝存在错边及明显的表面缺陷, 对其母材和焊缝分别进行拉伸和断裂韧性试验, 基于试验数据, 结合管道的基本参数和运行情况, 采用失效评定图(FAD)技术对环焊缝、螺旋焊缝缺陷进行了一级和二级评定, 定量分析管道缺陷处的安全裕度, 通过迭代计算得到了焊缝处的容许表面裂纹尺寸, 并对环焊缝、螺旋焊缝裂纹容限尺寸进行了定量研究。研究结果表明: 一级评定会低估管道的承载能力, 计算得到的裂纹容限尺寸小于二级; 管道在4 MPa运行压力下, 螺旋焊缝缺陷处安全裕度很小, 危险性高于环焊缝缺陷, 焊缝处的裂纹容限尺寸小于环焊缝; 相比于裂纹长度, 裂纹深度对评估结果的影响更大。通过研究, 为管道缺陷验收提供了依据, 为焊缝评价的科学化、合理化提供了参考。

     

    Abstract: Weld defects can be classified as major potential safety hazards that may negatively impact operation of aged pipelines. And for instance, in an old pipeline, the defects, misalignment and evident surface in its girth weld and spiral weld seams are found. Tensile and fracture toughness tests have been performed for parent materials and weld seams of the pipeline, respectively. Based on these test data and with consideration to basic parameters and operation of these pipelines, FAD has been deployed to perform Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ assessments of girth weld and spiral weld defects. In this way, safety margin around defected pipes can be analyzed quantitatively. Through iteration, sizes of allowable surface cracks can be determined. Furthermore, quantitative studies have been performed over crack tolerance sizes of girth weld and spiral welding lines. Relevant research results show that Class ⅠS assessments may underestimate bearing capacity of the pipeline, whereas the crack tolerance size determined through calculation is lower than those determined through Class Ⅱ assessments; under the operating pressure of 4 MPa, spiral weld defects of the pipeline displayed minor safety margin with hazards higher than those of girth weld defects, whereas crack tolerance size around welding lines is lower than that of girth weld; compared with crack length, crack depth displayed even higher impacts to assessment results. Relevant researches may provide solid criterions for acceptance of pipeline defects. In addition, these researches may provide valuable references to rational and scientific assessments of weld seams.

     

/

返回文章
返回