郑雅丽, 完颜祺琪, 丁国生, 赵艳杰, 李清山. 盐穴地下储气库大尺寸管柱造腔方式效果分析[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(2): 158-161. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.02.009
引用本文: 郑雅丽, 完颜祺琪, 丁国生, 赵艳杰, 李清山. 盐穴地下储气库大尺寸管柱造腔方式效果分析[J]. 油气储运, 2015, 34(2): 158-161. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.02.009
ZHENG Yali, WANYAN Qiqi, DING Guosheng, ZHAO Yanjie, LI Qingshan. Effect analysis of cavity building with large-size pipe string for underground salt cavern gas storage[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(2): 158-161. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.02.009
Citation: ZHENG Yali, WANYAN Qiqi, DING Guosheng, ZHAO Yanjie, LI Qingshan. Effect analysis of cavity building with large-size pipe string for underground salt cavern gas storage[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(2): 158-161. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.02.009

盐穴地下储气库大尺寸管柱造腔方式效果分析

Effect analysis of cavity building with large-size pipe string for underground salt cavern gas storage

  • 摘要: 为了研究大尺寸管柱造腔方式在我国特殊地质条件下的适用性,以我国某盐矿多夹层含盐地层为造腔目标,设计多套造腔地质方案开展模拟预测,分析其现场应用的可行性,并对造腔速率、耗电量等进行对比分析,同时对单井建腔的钻井、造腔、注气排卤等工程费用进行测算。结果表明:在特定的地质条件下,建造单腔有效体积38×104 m3的盐腔,大尺寸与常规尺寸造腔管柱组合的造腔方式相比,可以节约工期约30%,降低能耗约58%,节约单井建腔投资约17%。因此,大尺寸造腔管柱组合的造腔方式在加快造腔进度、节约成本、降低能耗方面具有明显优势,有必要加强攻关研究与推广应用。

     

    Abstract: In order to determine the applicability of the cavity building with large size pipe string under special geological conditions in China, taking the multi interbedded formation of a salt mine in our country as a cavity building target, many geological solutions are designed for carven building in multi interbedded formation in a salt mine. Their feasibility on site is analyzed. Moreover, the cavity rate and power consumption are contrastively analyzed, and the engineering costs of drilling, carven building, gas injection and brine discharge in single well are calculated. The results show that, to build a single salt cavern with effective volume of 38×104 m3 under certain geological conditions, the large size pipe string can reduce construction period about 30%, energy consumption about 58% and cavity building investment of single well about 17%, in contrast to the regular size pipe string. Therefore, the large size pipe string has obvious advantages in accelerating cavity building progress, cost savings and reducing energy consumption. It is worthy of further research and application.

     

/

返回文章
返回