田娜, 陈保东, 何利民, 陈其胜. 同沟敷设原油、成品油管道稳态温度场解析公式[J]. 油气储运, 2012, 31(2): 103-105, 108. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.02.006
引用本文: 田娜, 陈保东, 何利民, 陈其胜. 同沟敷设原油、成品油管道稳态温度场解析公式[J]. 油气储运, 2012, 31(2): 103-105, 108. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.02.006
Tian Na, Chen Baodong, He Limin, . Analytic formula of steady-state temperature field for the oil pipeline and refined oil product pipeline laid in one ditch[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2012, 31(2): 103-105, 108. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.02.006
Citation: Tian Na, Chen Baodong, He Limin, . Analytic formula of steady-state temperature field for the oil pipeline and refined oil product pipeline laid in one ditch[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2012, 31(2): 103-105, 108. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.02.006

同沟敷设原油、成品油管道稳态温度场解析公式

Analytic formula of steady-state temperature field for the oil pipeline and refined oil product pipeline laid in one ditch

  • 摘要: 常温成品油管道会影响同沟敷设的加热原油管道的土壤温度场。应用保角变换方法,推导了同沟敷设管道稳态土壤温度场的解析计算公式。以国内某同沟敷设管道为例,分别采用解析公式和数值模拟方法计算稳态土壤温度场,结果表明:在与管道水平距离小于2.5 m的范围内,数值模拟结果大于解析公式计算结果;在与管道水平距离大于2.5 m的范围内,数值模拟结果小于解析公式计算结果;两者的相对误差最大为5%,因此验证了解析公式的正确性。误差产生原因:一是两种方法的计算区域不同,解析法认为管道截面水平方向无穷远处的土壤自然温度场不受管道影响,而数值模拟法认为管道截面水平方向的计算区域存在边界;二是在公式推导过程中,为简化计算,对一些参数取平均值。

     

    Abstract: For the pipelines served as crude oil and refined oil product laid in one ditch, soil temperature field of hot crude oil pipeline is influenced by the cool refined oil product pipeline. Analytic formula of steady-state soil temperature field is deduced by conformal mapping. As an illustration, the static temperature field of the pipelines laid in one ditch in China is respectively calculated by analytic formula and numerical simulation. The result obtained by the numerical simulation is higher than the result calculated by the analytic formula within 2.5 meters of the pipe. Outside of that range, the result computed by the analytic formula is higher than the result obtained by numerical simulation. The relative error by using these two methods is less than 5%. So the analytic formula is validated. The error is caused by the two reasons as follows: in the analytic method, the first reason is that the computed domain for different methods is different, the natural soil temperature is regarded as not influenced by the heated pipeline, i.e., the computed domain is not bounded; While in the numerical simulation, the computed domain is bounded. The second reason is that some parameters are simplify chosen as their mean value during the formula derivation process.

     

/

返回文章
返回