储小燕, 沈士明. 南京市天然气利用工程管道的风险评价[J]. 油气储运, 2005, 24(3): 13-16. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.03.004
引用本文: 储小燕, 沈士明. 南京市天然气利用工程管道的风险评价[J]. 油气储运, 2005, 24(3): 13-16. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.03.004
CHU Xiaoyan, SHEN Shiming. Risk Assessment of Pipeline in Natural Gas Utilization Engineering in Nanjing City[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2005, 24(3): 13-16. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.03.004
Citation: CHU Xiaoyan, SHEN Shiming. Risk Assessment of Pipeline in Natural Gas Utilization Engineering in Nanjing City[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2005, 24(3): 13-16. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.03.004

南京市天然气利用工程管道的风险评价

Risk Assessment of Pipeline in Natural Gas Utilization Engineering in Nanjing City

  • 摘要: W. Kent Muhlbauer的指数评分法是一种比较成熟的管道风险评价方法, 但该方法还存在不完善之处。通过对此方法加以改进, 并将改进后的方法用于南京市城市天然气利用工程高压输气管道的风险评价中, 实际应用结果表明, 此改进方法的评价结果与相关文献的结果相一致, 其表达更明确更直观。

     

    Abstract: Risk assessment has been widely applied in many industrial fields since it raised in the 80's of last century. At the same time, risk assessment of pipeline has well developed gradually. Of many risk assessment methods of pipeline, W. Kent Muhlbauer's index method is the most reliable, but it also has some disadvantages. W. Kent Muhlbauer's method is improved in this paper, and the improved method is used to evaluate the high-pressure pipeline in Natural Gas Utilization Engineering in Nanjing City. The indication of the assessment results is identical with results in relative article and clearer, straightforward.

     

/

返回文章
返回