长输管道穿越河流盾构隧道位移分析与管控措施评估

Displacement analysis and control measure evaluation of shield tunnels for long-distance pipelines crossing rivers

  • 摘要:
    目的 盾构隧道是长输油气管道穿越河流湖泊的主要方式之一,在温度、输送压力、浮力等内外荷载作用下管道易产生位移过大、应力超标等问题,对管道隐患问题开展管控研究可有效保障管道安全运行。
    方法 以典型隧道穿越段输气管道竖向位移隐患治理为例,采用ABAQUS软件建立管道、钢性支座及混凝土支墩有限元模型,分析隧道内充水状态与无水状态下管道应力水平与位移状态,结合管道整体布局、约束形式、支座螺栓状态及有限元分析结果,剖析管道竖向位移过大的原因。为避免类似管道位移隐患问题再次发生,开展了螺栓修复与腐蚀控制、隧道漏水修复、环形钢支架加固、混凝土支墩拆除等治理措施,并采用管道应力与位移监测技术对温差、输送压力、自重、浮力作用下的输气管道开展了动态监测与数据分析。
    结果 在充水状态下,管道在运行工况与设计工况应力最大值分别为300.20 MPa、334.20 MPa,管道处于高应力水平;抽水后,管道应力显著降低,最大值分别为171.46 MPa、214.67 MPa。在治理期间,现场施工作业使管道应力与位移监测数据发生小幅度变化,监测截面中应力幅值最大在10 MPa之内,位移幅值不超过10 mm;在冬季保供期间,管道应力与位移虽发生上下波动,但应力安全裕量充足,最小值为145.32 MPa,管道处于安全运行状态。
    结论 支座螺栓断裂是水下隧道穿越管道安全隐患的风险成因,水浮力荷载是导致管道竖向位移过大的直接原因。针对隧道穿越段管道工程中存在的隐患问题,可结合有限元分析和应力与位移综合监测技术,形成从隐患发生到原因分析再到综合整治的管控流程。考虑到输送工况变化会导致管道应力与位移频繁波动,今后需进一步结合监测数据评估输送工况对管道疲劳寿命的潜在影响。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Shield tunnels are a primary method for long-distance oil and gas pipelines to cross rivers and lakes. Internal and external loads, such as temperature, transportation pressure, and buoyancy, can lead to issues like excessive displacement and stress beyond acceptable limits. Conducting research on the control of potential pipeline hazards is essential for ensuring safe operation.
    Methods Taking the hazard treatment of the vertical displacement of a gas pipeline in a typical tunnel crossing section as an example, finite element models of the pipeline, rigid supports, and concrete piers were developed using ABAQUS software. The stress and displacement of the pipeline were analyzed under both water-filled and water-free tunnel conditions. By considering the pipeline layout, constraint types, support bolt conditions, and finite element analysis results, the causes of excessive vertical displacement were identified. To prevent recurrence, measures including bolt repair and corrosion protection, tunnel leak remediation, reinforcement of annular steel supports, and removal of concrete piers were implemented. Dynamic monitoring and data analysis of pipeline stress and displacement, considering temperature variation, operational pressure, self-weight, and buoyancy, were conducted using advanced monitoring technology.
    Results In the water-filled condition, the maximum stress values of the pipeline were 300.20 MPa under operating conditions and 334.20 MPa under design conditions, indicating high-stress levels. After the water was drained, stress levels significantly decreased, with maximum values dropping to 171.46 MPa and 214.67 MPa, respectively. During the treatment process, minor fluctuations in pipeline stress and displacement were observed; the maximum stress amplitude was within 10 MPa, and the displacement amplitude did not exceed 10 mm in the monitoring section. During the winter supply securing period, although some fluctuations occurred, the minimum observed stress was 145.32 MPa, demonstrating a sufficient safety margin and stable pipeline operation.
    Conclusion The fracture of support bolts poses significant safety risks for underwater tunnel-crossing pipelines, with water buoyancy being the direct cause of excessive vertical displacement. A control process encompassing the identification of potential hazards, cause analysis, and comprehensive treatment can be established through finite element analysis and advanced monitoring technologies. Given that variations in transportation conditions can lead to frequent fluctuations in pipeline stress and displacement, future assessment of their impact on pipeline fatigue life, based on monitoring data, is necessary for safety assurance.

     

/

返回文章
返回