管桥坍塌状态下悬空管道受力分析与理论模型验证

Force analysis and theoretical model verification of suspended pipeline after pipe bridge collapse

  • 摘要:
    目的 管桥是长输油气管道跨越公路等复杂地形的主要结构形式之一,管桥破坏会导致管道悬空、变形甚至断裂,准确评估管桥受损后管道力学状态是确定抢修方案、避免损失扩大的关键前提。
    方法 以某管桥坍塌事故为例,建立悬空管道弹性约束理论模型,将竖管简化为顶端铰支且承受弯矩,底端分别为铰支和固定两种理论模型。通过顶端结点处变形协调条件建立竖管与悬空管道的转角关系,推导悬空管道弯矩及竖向位移的解析表达式;采用CAESAR II软件建立管道三维有限元模型,并采用超声应力检测技术获取现场悬空管道关键截面的应力状态,将理论计算值与有限元模拟结果、超声应力检测值、现场实测值进行对比,验证理论模型的合理性与适用性。
    结果 相较于竖管底部固定模型,竖管底部铰支模型在悬空管道跨中竖向位移、端部弯矩及应力分布等方面与有限元模拟结果及实测值更吻合。管桥坍塌后悬空管道跨中竖向位移理论计算值、有限元模拟结果、现场实测值分别为58.8 cm、58.6 cm、60 cm,理论计算值与有限元模拟结果、现场实测值误差均在3%以内。管道跨中及端部应力理论计算值与有限元模拟结果的误差均在3%以内,理论计算值与超声应力检测值的误差不超过18%。基于理论计算值、有限元模拟结果和现场超声检测值对悬空管道进行强度校核,最大当量应力分别为149.1 MPa、148.8 MPa、158.3 MPa,均满足规范要求,管道应力安全余量充足。
    结论 通过理论计算值与有限元模拟结果、实测值、超声应力检测值的对比,验证了管桥坍塌后悬空管道弹性约束理论模型的合理性与适用性。提出的弹性转动约束理论模型可为同类管桥坍塌事故下管道安全状态的快速分析与应急抢修决策提供参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Pipe bridges are one of the main structural forms for long-distance oil and gas pipelines crossing highways and other complex terrain. Their failure can cause pipeline suspension, deformation, or even rupture. Accurately evaluating the mechanical state of the pipeline after pipe bridge damage is a critical prerequisite for determining emergency repair schemes and preventing further losses.
    Methods A pipe bridge collapse accident was used as a case study. An elastic constraint theoretical model for the suspended pipeline is established. The vertical pipe is simplified to have a hinged top end subjected to a bending moment. Two theoretical models are adopted, with the bottom end set as hinged and fixed respectively. The rotation relationship between the vertical pipe and suspended pipeline was derived from deformation compatibility at the top joint. Analytical expressions for the bending moment and vertical displacement of the suspended pipeline were then obtained. A three-dimensional Finite Element (FE) model of the pipeline is developed using CAESAR II FE analysis software. Ultrasonic stress testing is applied to obtain the stress state at key sections of the in-situ suspended pipeline. Theoretical calculation results are compared with FE simulation results, ultrasonic stress test values, and field measured values to verify the rationality and applicability of the theoretical model.
    Results The hinged-bottom model agreed better with FE simulations and field measurements than the fixed-bottom model. This held for mid-span vertical displacement, end bending moment, and stress distribution. After collapse, the mid-span vertical displacement was 58.8 cm (theoretical), 58.6 cm (FE), and 60.0 cm (field). The theoretical values deviated from the FE results and field measurements by less than 3%. The theoretical stresses at the mid-span and ends were within 3% of FE results. They were within 18% of ultrasonic stress measurements. A strength check was performed using theoretical results, FE results, and on-site ultrasonic measurements. The maximum equivalent stresses were 149.1, 148.8, and 158.3 MPa, respectively. All satisfied code requirements and indicated a sufficient stress safety margin.
    Conclusion The rationality and applicability of the elastic constraint theoretical model for suspended pipelines after pipe bridge collapse are verified through comparisons of theoretical calculation values with FE simulation results, field measured values, and ultrasonic stress test values. The proposed elastic rotational constraint model provides a valuable reference for rapid safety state analysis and emergency repair decision-making in similar pipe bridge collapse accidents.

     

/

返回文章
返回