全球石油贸易依赖网络的时空演化及驱动机制

Spatio-temporal evolution and driving mechanisms of the global petroleum trade dependency network

  • 摘要:
    目的 为应对全球石油贸易格局的复杂变化与能源安全挑战,系统揭示2013—2023年全球石油贸易依赖网络的时空演化规律及其多维驱动机制,以期为中国构建稳健、多元的能源供应体系提供理论依据与决策参考。
    方法 基于联合国商品贸易数据库中2013—2023年的全球石油贸易数据,构建全球石油贸易网络;运用复杂网络分析方法与时间指数随机图模型,系统解析网络结构的整体演变特征、节点中心性动态以及全球石油贸易依赖网络时空演化的作用机制。
    结果 全球石油贸易网络整体密度持续下降,反映出结构连通性不足与脆弱性特征;同时,平均聚类系数显著上升,平均路径长度缩短,表明区域内部贸易联盟的形成提升了局部贸易效率。节点影响力分析显示,美国凭借页岩技术革命巩固了其在贸易规模与路径控制中的主导地位;中国尽管在贸易流量权重上有所下降,但通过强化转口与枢纽功能,仍维持了在网络中的关键结构性作用。TERGM模型进一步识别出3类核心驱动机制:技术革新削弱了地理距离对贸易的约束,推动网络向多极化发展;极端事件(如地缘冲突、疫情)加速了区域性闭环体系的形成;制度协同(如区域贸易协定)的影响显著超过地理邻近性,成为塑造贸易关系的关键外生因素。
    结论 全球石油贸易网络在整体稀疏化与局部集群化的结构性调整中,展现出较强的区域适应性与路径重构能力。基于此,未来中国能源政策应注重技术变革、制度协同与储备体系的有机结合,通过主动构建网络结构性优势、积极参与能源贸易规则制定、健全动态监测与应急响应体系等方式,系统提升能源系统的整体韧性与安全保障能力。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective This study systematically analyzes the spatio-temporal evolution and multidimensional driving mechanisms of the global petroleum trade dependency network from 2013 to 2023, aiming to provide a theoretical foundation and decision-making support for China’s development of a resilient and diversified energy supply system.
    Methods Based on global petroleum trade data from 2013 to 2023 obtained from the United Nations Comtrade Database, a global petroleum trade network was constructed. The overall evolution of the network structure, node centrality dynamics, and the mechanisms driving the spatio-temporal evolution of the global petroleum trade dependency network were systematically analyzed using complex network analysis and the Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model (TERGM).
    Results A continuous decrease in the overall density of the global petroleum trade network was observed, indicating insufficient structural connectivity and increased vulnerability. Meanwhile, a significant rise in the average clustering coefficient and a reduction in average path length were noted, suggesting that the formation of regional trade alliances enhanced local trade efficiency. Analysis of node influence revealed that the United States’ dominant position in trade scale and path control was consolidated through the shale technology revolution. Although China’s share in trade flow declined, its key structural role in the network was maintained by strengthening re-export and hub functions. The TERGM further identified three core driving mechanisms: technological innovation weakened the constraint of geographical distance and promoted network multipolarization; extreme events (such as geopolitical conflicts and the pandemic) accelerated the formation of regional closed-loop systems; and institutional collaboration (such as regional trade agreements) exerted a significantly greater influence than geographical proximity, emerging as a key exogenous factor shaping trade relations.
    Conclusion The global petroleum trade network exhibits strong regional adaptability and path reconstruction amid overall sparsification and local clustering. Therefore, China’s future energy policy should integrate technological innovation, institutional collaboration, and reserve systems. By leveraging structural advantages, engaging in energy trade rule-making, and enhancing dynamic monitoring and emergency response, the resilience and security of the energy system can be systematically strengthened.

     

/

返回文章
返回