绿色能源在油气田中的应用现状、不足及发展趋势探讨

Discussion on current status, limitations, and development trends of green energy applications in oil and gas fields

  • 摘要:
    目的 在“双碳”背景下,传统供能模式下油气田高耗能高排放问题亟待解决,而在油气田场景中绿色能源对传统能源替代与应用方面的研究成果尚缺乏系统性梳理与分析。为厘清绿色能源在油气田中的应用情况,制定绿色能源与油气田生产需求精准对接的供能方案。
    方法 采用文献梳理、案例分析及技术适配性评估相结合的方法,系统检索国内外有关绿色能源在油气田应用领域的研究成果,结合行业报告与实际案例,重点分析太阳能、地热能、余热、风能、波浪能等在油气田中的应用现状与不足。
    结果 所列绿色能源在油气田中的应用均具备可行性,且多数技术已落地,但仍具有优化与升级潜力。光伏技术趋于成熟,但部分场景中仍受限于地域与系统集成成本;地热能利用油田产出水与废弃井资源,通过水源热泵供暖与中低温发电可显著降低碳排放;余热回收以热泵技术为主,普适性强但技术路线单一;风能利用以发电为主,兼有风力发热的试验性研究,技术路线较为单一;波浪能在海上油气田中展现出巨大应用潜力,但仍处于初级试验阶段;氢能、生物质能试验与案例较少,但同样具有应用潜力。
    结论 光伏发电、地热水源热泵技术及余热回收技术最为成熟,应作为绿色供能的首推方向。此外,要结合不同地区油气田环境资源、产能及产品特点合理选择绿色能源应用方案。研究结果为油气企业明确了绿色能源替代的优先级,为研发部门指出了技术突破的重点方向。未来油气田绿色能源研究应聚焦长期实地跟踪,构建全生命周期数据库,精准评估技术与环境效益;发展多能互补系统与废弃资源高效利用,优化能源匹配,实现降本增效。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In the context of the “dual-carbon” goals, the high energy consumption and emissions associated with traditional oil and gas supply models require urgent attention. A systematic review of research on the substitution of traditional energy by green energy in oil and gas fields is lacking. This study aims to clarify green energy applications in these fields and develop energy supply solutions that align precisely with their production needs.
    Methods A combination of literature review, case analysis, and technical suitability assessment was employed. Research findings on green energy applications in oil and gas fields at home and abroad were systematically retrieved. Based on industry reports and real-world cases, the application status and limitations of solar, geothermal, waste heat, wind, and wave energy in oil and gas fields were analyzed.
    Results The application of the listed green energy sources in oil and gas fields was found to be feasible, with most technologies having been implemented. However, potential for further optimization and upgrading was identified. Photovoltaic technology was considered mature, though limited in some scenarios by geographical factors and system integration costs. Geothermal energy utilization, using produced water from oil fields and abandoned wells, was shown to significantly reduce carbon emissions through water-source heat pump heating and medium- to low-temperature power generation. Waste heat recovery was primarily achieved through heat pump technology, which was highly adaptable but followed a single technical route. Wind energy was mainly used for power generation, with some experimental research on wind-powered heating, though the technical route remained relatively single. Wave energy was found to have significant potential in offshore oil and gas fields but remained in the early experimental stage. Few experiments and cases regarding hydrogen and biomass energy were reported, though both were considered to have application potential.
    Conclusion Photovoltaic power generation, geothermal water-source heat pump technology, and waste heat recovery are identified as the most mature solutions and should serve as primary directions for green energy supply. Additionally, green energy application strategies should be selected based on the environmental resources, production capacity, and product characteristics of oil and gas fields in different regions. The research clarifies the priorities for green energy substitution in oil and gas enterprises and highlights key areas for technological breakthroughs for R&D departments. Future research should focus on long-term on-site tracking, the development of a full life-cycle database, and precise evaluation of technical and environmental benefits. Efforts should also be directed toward developing multi-energy complementary systems, efficient utilization of abandoned resources, optimizing energy matching, and achieving cost reduction and efficiency improvement.

     

/

返回文章
返回