海洋新能源与油气多能融合开发模式及工程应用分析

Multi-energy integration development modes and engineering application analysis of marine renewables and oil & gas

  • 摘要:
    目的 针对海洋油气田开发过程中碳排放强度高、能源利用效率低的问题,以及海上新能源开发面临的深远海成本高、消纳困难等挑战,研究海洋新能源与油气多能互补融合开发的工程模式,为海洋能源绿色低碳转型提供技术路径与实践参考。
    方法 基于国家能源政策导向与海洋能源资源禀赋,系统梳理海洋新能源与油气融合发展的行业现状,剖析当前产业发展面临的装备技术、电网稳定、商业模式、资源统筹等核心技术挑战,从技术原理、装备体系、适配场景、经济成本、运维特性等维度开展综合对比分析。
    结果 重点构建并探讨了固定式风电融合、半潜式漂浮风电融合、张力腿漂浮风电融合、海洋温差能与地热融合、弃置平台多能改造、海上新能源-算电协同与油气融合六种核心工程模式,可全面覆盖近海、深远海等各类海洋油气开发场景。各项工程实践充分验证了多能融合模式的可行性与先进性,结合发展现状应优先推广近海固定式风电融合、深远海半潜式漂浮风电融合等技术成熟、经济性优异的模式;同时依托现有油气开发区存量资源,大规模推进海上绿电替代工程,持续降低油气生产环节碳排放,批量打造绿色油田示范项目;推动张力腿式大兆瓦浮式风电技术迭代与规模化工程应用,构建深远海大容量多能互补融合示范基地。
    结论 海洋新能源与油气融合发展是实现海洋能源绿色低碳转型的重要路径,能够显著降低油气田开发碳排放,提高新能源开发经济性。后续研究应加快关键技术攻关,完善政策标准体系,推进规模化示范应用。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Offshore oil and gas production suffers from high carbon intensity and low energy efficiency. Meanwhile, marine renewable developments in deep and far seas are hindered by high capital costs and power accommodation limits. This study therefore explores engineering modes for multi-energy complementary integration between marine renewables and oil & gas systems. It aims to provide technical pathways and practical references for the green and low-carbon transition of marine energy.
    Methods Rooted in national energy policies and local marine resource endowments, this paper systematically reviews the state of integrated marine renewable and oil & gas development. It further identifies major industrial barriers covering hardware equipment, grid stability, commercial mechanisms and resource coordination. A cross-dimensional comparison is then conducted from technical principles, equipment architectures, application scenarios, economic performance and operation & maintenance perspectives.
    Results Six core engineering modes are defined and examined in this work. These schemes cover fixed offshore wind integration, semi-submersible floating wind integration, tension-leg floating wind integration, ocean thermal-geothermal coupling, multi-energy retrofitting of decommissioned platforms, and offshore renewable power-computing synergy linked to oil and gas operations. These modes fully cover nearshore and deep-and-far-sea scenarios for offshore oil and gas development. Engineering practices have validated the feasibility and technical advantages of these multi-energy integration schemes. Priority shall be placed on technically proven, cost-effective options. Representative examples include nearshore fixed offshore wind integration and deep-and-far-sea semi-submersible floating wind integration. Existing assets within oil and gas development zones can be reused to deploy large-scale green power substitution schemes. Such projects cut operational carbon emissions during hydrocarbon production and support the rollout of multiple green oilfield demonstration sites. Continuous upgrades of large-megawatt tension-leg floating wind technology will facilitate the construction of large-capacity multi-energy complementary demonstration bases tailored for deep and far seas.
    Conclusion Integrating marine renewables with oil & gas assets represents a critical pathway toward the green low-carbon transition of marine energy. This integration substantially curbs carbon emissions from offshore field operations and improves the economic competitiveness of marine renewable projects. Future research should prioritize breakthroughs in core technologies, refine policy and standard frameworks, and accelerate large-scale demonstration deployments.

     

/

返回文章
返回