深远海电氢耦合技术现状与工程应用模式分析

Analysis on the current status and engineering application modes of deep-sea electro-hydrogen coupling technology

  • 摘要:
    目的 深远海风电资源丰富且用海限制因素少,是未来海上风电发展的重要研究方向,海上电氢耦合技术则是提升深远海风电输电经济性与解决风电消纳困难的主要路径。
    方法 高盐、高湿的海洋环境及风电波动性等使得海上电氢耦合技术、运行效率、可靠性与陆上有很大差异,通过文献分析、类比分析及逻辑推演相结合的方法,分析海上电氢耦合技术的特点与面临的挑战,提出不同的工程应用模式,并剖析各模式场景下的技术瓶颈。
    结果 当前深远海风电的电氢耦合模式主要包括陆上集中电氢转化、海上集中电氢转化、海上分散式电氢转化、电氢转化与油气融合、电氢转化与综合能源岛融合等5种。其中,陆上集中电氢转化模式的技术较为成熟,但需要将深远海风电输送到陆地终端,并进一步开展技术性与经济性分析对比;其余4种模式均需要先在海上设施中进行电氢转化,相关技术尚不成熟,因此,前期可先在浅水海上油气田周边开展具备油气管道的固定式风场电氢耦合模式,随后在深水油气田周边开展具备油气管道的浮式风场电氢耦合模式,最后发展海上分散式电氢转化模式、电氢转化与综合能源岛融合模式。
    结论 对于海上集中电氢转化模式,电氢转化设施应首选浅水区域的固定设施,如果采用浮式设施,需重点关注动态电缆与滑环的电压等级、电流容量、散热问题;对于海上分散式电氢转化模式,应重点关注浮式风机电解槽的机械强度、管道氢脆、柔性立管或动态连接器的安全与集成等问题。文中相关研究结论可为深远海风电资源规划布局与规模化开发方案制定提供理论支撑与实践参考。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Deep-sea wind power offers abundant resources with fewer marine space constraints, making it a key focus for future offshore wind power development. Offshore electro-hydrogen coupling (EHC) technology serves as a major approach to improve the economic efficiency of power transmission for deep-sea wind power and solve the difficulty of wind power accommodation.
    Methods The high salinity and humidity of the marine environment, combined with wind power fluctuations, create significant differences in technology, operational efficiency, and reliability between offshore and onshore EHC systems. A combination of literature review, comparative analysis and logical deduction was adopted to analyze the characteristics and challenges of offshore EHC technology, propose various engineering application modes, and identify the technical bottlenecks under each scenario.
    Results Five typical EHC modes for deep-sea wind power were identified: onshore centralized electro-hydrogen conversion, offshore centralized electro-hydrogen conversion, offshore decentralized electro-hydrogen conversion, electro-hydrogen conversion integrated with oil and gas systems, and electro-hydrogen conversion integrated with comprehensive energy islands. The onshore centralized electro-hydrogen conversion mode was technologically mature but required transmitting deep-sea wind power to onshore terminals, necessitating further technical and economic evaluation. The other four modes involved offshore electro-hydrogen conversion, where technologies remained underdeveloped. A phased development path was proposed: 1) Demonstrate EHC at fixed wind farms with oil and gas pipelines near shallow offshore oil and gas fields. 2) Expand to EHC at floating wind farms with oil and gas pipelines near deep-water oil and gas fields. 3) Develop offshore decentralized electro-hydrogen conversion and electro-hydrogen conversion integrated with comprehensive energy islands.
    Conclusion For the offshore centralized electro-hydrogen conversion, fixed facilities in shallow waters are preferred for housing electro-hydrogen conversion equipment. If floating facilities are used, special attention must be given to the voltage class, current capacity, and heat dissipation of dynamic cables and slip rings. In the offshore decentralized electro-hydrogen conversion, key challenges include the mechanical strength of electrolyzers mounted on floating wind turbines, hydrogen embrittlement of pipelines, and the safety and integration of flexible risers or dynamic connectors. These findings offer theoretical guidance and practical references for the planning, layout, and large-scale development of deep-sea wind power resources.

     

/

返回文章
返回