极端情景下天然气需求侧调节保供模型与情景模拟

Demand-side regulation and supply security model for natural gas and scenario simulation under extreme conditions

  • 摘要:
    目的 当前国际地缘政治冲突频发,天然气贸易脆弱性显著攀升,构建科学合理的天然气应急调控与调节保供机制对保障国家能源安全至关重要。
    方法 提出了一种极端情景下天然气需求侧调节保供模型,以实现不同省份、不同行业天然气调节保供的精准分配。首先,创新性引入了不可操作性投入产出模型、复杂网络理论、贝叶斯概率更新方法,从宏观经济影响、网络结构重要性及社会民生影响3个维度,构建了国民经济各行业重要性的综合评估指标体系。其次,以三维综合损失最小为目标,构建基于多目标优化的两阶段调节保供模型。上层利用改进的非支配排序遗传算法实现全国层面行业天然气调控方案的帕累托寻优,下层遵循“底线优先-余量均摊”的迭代分配规则将调控方案精准分解至省域。
    结果 基于2023年投入产出与能源统计数据,对3种不同程度的天然气进口中断情景进行了模拟分析。结果表明:①在轻度短缺下,保供策略呈边际效益最大化导向,通过微调高耗能行业即可实现供需平衡;②在中度短缺下,行业调控依然高度依赖高消耗、大体量的基础行业,区域性保供特征呈现分化,山东、云南等重化工型省份被迫承担更多的保供责任以保全其他省份核心技术产业;③在极度短缺下,资源分配高度集中于保障民生、医疗、油气生产、医药制造等社会核心功能,区域分化特征加剧。
    结论 建议推动天然气需求侧应急调节机制向精细化、定量化、动态化升级,探索建立跨省区天然气应急调控利益补偿机制,根据行业在国家社会经济中的重要程度实行差异化用气引导以提升行业的需求弹性。研究结果可为中国天然气应急保供体系的精细化治理提供定量化决策支撑,助力实现天然气短缺极端情景下的精准保障。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Frequent geopolitical conflicts heighten the vulnerability of the global natural gas trade. Establishing a robust emergency regulation and supply framework is essential for national energy security.
    Methods A demand-side regulation and supply security model for natural gas under extreme conditions is proposed to achieve precise allocation across provinces and sectors. First, three methods are innovatively introduced, including the inoperability input-output model, the complex network theory, and the Bayesian probability updating method. They are used to construct a comprehensive evaluation index system for sector importance. The system covers three dimensions: macroeconomic impacts, structural importance of the network, and livelihood impacts. Second, a two-stage multi-objective optimization model is built to minimize three-dimensional comprehensive losses. At the upper level, an improved non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm performs Pareto optimization of sector regulation schemes at the national level. At the lower level, national schemes are precisely decomposed to provincial regions using an iterative “bottom-line priority and surplus sharing” allocation rule.
    Results Three natural gas import disruption scenarios of varying severity are simulated using 2023 input-output and energy statistical data. The results indicate that: (1) Under a mild shortage, supply security prioritizes maximizing marginal benefits, achieving supply-demand balance through minor adjustments in energy-intensive industries. (2) Under a moderate shortage, regulation relies heavily on high-consumption, large-scale basic industries, revealing regional disparities in supply security. Heavy-chemical provinces (e.g., Shandong and Yunnan) undertake more supply security responsibilities to protect core high-tech industries in other provinces. (3) Under an extreme shortage, resource allocation concentrates strictly on critical social functions — such as public livelihood, healthcare, oil and gas production, and pharmaceutical manufacturing — further intensifying regional differentiation.
    Conclusion Recommendations include refining, quantifying, and dynamically updating the natural gas demand-side emergency regulation mechanism. An inter-provincial benefit compensation framework should also be established. Differentiated consumption guidance should then be implemented based on sectoral importance to enhance demand elasticity.

     

/

返回文章
返回