考虑各向异性效应的管道钢材料力学行为表征

Characterization of the Mechanical Behavior of Pipeline Steel Considering Anisotropic Effects

  • 摘要: 卷板轧制工艺会引起管道材料织构演化和力学性能方向分化,使其在不同方向表现出明显的屈服、强化与变形差异,并影响管道服役过程中的局部塑性变形与失效。针对传统各向同性本构模型难以准确表征管道钢方向相关塑性行为的问题,本文以X52管道钢为研究对象,开展了不同取向的原位拉伸试验,获得其应力-应变关系及塑性应变比参数,并对5种硬化模型进行了对比分析,确定了适用于X52管道钢塑性阶段的最优硬化模型。在此基础上,结合Hill48屈服函数、独立塑性势函数和Multi-Voce硬化模型,建立了非关联流动各向异性本构框架,并通过与基于Mises屈服准则的数值模型对比,验证了其对宏观塑性变形响应的预测能力。结果表明,X52管道钢具有明显的强度各向异性,而塑性流动各向异性的变化相对有限。各向同性模型和各向异性模型均能够较好预测不同取向试样的载荷-位移响应,其中各向异性模型在统一参数体系下实现了对不同取向塑性响应的整体表征,具有更好的物理一致性和参数可迁移性,该模型可为管道钢方向相关塑性行为分析以及复杂服役条件下管道结构塑性失效评估与延性断裂预测提供理论基础。

     

    Abstract: Rolled plate processing induces texture evolution and directional variations in the mechanical properties of pipeline steels, leading to pronounced differences in yielding, hardening, and deformation behavior along different directions, and consequently affecting localized plastic deformation and failure during pipeline service. To address the limitation of conventional isotropic constitutive models in characterizing the direction-dependent plastic behavior of pipeline steels, X52 pipeline steel was selected as the research material in this study. In-situ tensile tests were conducted along different orientations to obtain the stress-strain responses and plastic strain ratio parameters, and five hardening models were comparatively evaluated to identify the most suitable hardening law for describing the plastic-stage response of X52 pipeline steel. On this basis, a non-associated anisotropic constitutive framework was established by combining the Hill48 yield function, an independent plastic potential function, and the Multi-Voce hardening model. Its ability to predict macroscopic plastic deformation was validated through comparison with a numerical model based on the von Mises yield criterion. The results show that X52 pipeline steel exhibits pronounced strength anisotropy, whereas the variation in plastic flow anisotropy is relatively limited. Both the isotropic and anisotropic models can accurately reproduce the load-displacement responses of specimens with different orientations. Compared with the isotropic model, the anisotropic model provides an integrated description of the plastic responses in different orientations within a unified parameter framework, demonstrating better physical consistency and parameter transferability. The proposed model can provide a theoretical basis for analyzing the direction-dependent plastic behavior of pipeline steels, as well as for evaluating plastic failure and predicting ductile fracture of pipeline structures under complex service conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回