绿色能源在油气田中的应用现状、不足与发展趋势探讨

  • 摘要: 【目的】在“双碳”背景下,传统供能模式下的油气田暴露出的高耗能高排放问题亟待解决,而绿色能源在油气田场景中对传统能源替代与应用方面的研究成果尚缺乏系统性梳理与分析。为摸清绿色能源在油气田中的应用情况,制定科学的绿色能源与油气田生产需求对接的供能方案。【方法】采用“文献梳理 + 案例分析 + 技术适配性评估”相结合的方法,系统检索国内外有关绿色能源在油气田应用领域的研究成果,结合行业报告及实际案例,重点分析了太阳能、地热能、余热、风能、波浪能等在油气田中的应用现状与不足。【结果】结果表明:所列几种绿色能源应用于油气田均具有可行性,且大部分技术已落地,但仍具有开发与改进潜力;光伏技术趋于成熟但部分场景中仍受限于地域与系统集成成本;地热能利用油田产出水与废弃井资源,通过水源热泵供暖及中低温发电可显著降低碳排放;余热回收以热泵技术为主,其普适性强但技术路线单一;风能利用以发电为主,兼有风力发热的试验性研究,线路较为单一;波浪能在海上油气田中展现出巨大应用潜力,但仍处于初级试验阶段;氢能、生物质能试验及案例较少,但同样具有应用潜力。【结论】纵观全局,光伏发电、地热水源热泵技术及余热回收等技术最为成熟,应作为绿色供能的首推方向:要结合不同地区油气田环境资源、产能及产品等特点合理选择绿色能源应用方案。分析结果为油气企业明确了绿色能源替代的优先级,为研发部门指出了技术突破的重点方向。未来油气田绿色能源研究应聚焦长期实地跟踪,构建全生命周期数据库,精准评估技术与环境效益。发展多能互补系统和废弃资源高效利用,优化能源匹配,降本增效。

     

    Abstract: Objective Under the "dual carbon" goals, the high energy consumption and emissions of traditional oil and gas field energy supply models urgently require solutions, yet systematic reviews and analyses of green energy applications in these contexts remain limited. Methods To assess the application of green energy in oil and gas fields and develop scientifically tailored energy supply strategies, a methodology combining literature review, case studies, and technical adaptability evaluation was employed to systematically analyze global research on green energy applications in oil and gas fields, integrating industry reports and practical cases. The focus was on the application status and limitations of solar energy, geothermal energy, waste heat, wind energy, and wave energy. Results Findings indicate that these green energy sources are feasible for oil and gas fields, with most technologies already implemented but possessing further development potential. Photovoltaic technology is relatively mature but constrained by regional conditions and system integration costs in certain scenarios. Geothermal energy, utilizing produced water and abandoned wells, significantly reduces carbon emissions through water-source heat pumps for heating and medium-to-low temperature power generation. Waste heat recovery, primarily via heat pump technology, is highly adaptable but limited by a single technical pathway. Wind energy is mainly used for power generation, with experimental studies on wind-driven heating, though applications remain limited. Wave energy shows significant potential in offshore oil and gas fields but is still in early experimental stages. Hydrogen and biomass energy have fewer trials and cases but also hold application potential. Conclusion Overall, photovoltaic power generation, geothermal water-source heat pumps, and waste heat recovery are the most mature technologies and should be prioritized for green energy supply. Green energy solutions should be selected based on regional environmental resources, production capacity, and product characteristics of oil and gas fields. The analysis clarifies the priority of green energy substitution for oil and gas enterprises and highlights key directions for technological breakthroughs. Future research should focus on long-term field studies, establishing full lifecycle databases, and accurately evaluating technical and environmental benefits. Developing multi-energy complementary systems and efficient utilization of abandoned resources will optimize energy matching and achieve cost reduction and efficiency gains.

     

/

返回文章
返回