火电厂绿氨掺烧场景下液氨储运技术及经济性分析

Technical and economic analysis of liquid ammonia storage and transportation in the scenario of green ammonia co-firing in thermal power plants

  • 摘要:
    目的 氨是一种良好的零碳燃料,绿氨掺烧已成为中国火电厂低碳化改造建设的主要技术路径之一,既可有效解决火电厂降碳问题,又能很好解决风光等可再生能源大规模消纳及长周期储能问题,大规模、高效、经济、安全地储运液氨尤为重要。
    方法 从氨的主要特性与氨储能两方面阐述了氨燃料的优缺点,详细介绍了液氨运输和储存方式。为改进现有液氨储存工艺,提出一种中压常温与低压降温相组合的新型液氨储存方式,其充分兼顾两种储存方式的优点,具有节能、节水、安全性较高、投资费用适中的优势。以某燃煤火电厂2×660 MW机组掺烧10%(以热量计)绿氨工程为典型案例,给出具体液氨储运技术方案以及主要设备设计参数选型,并对3种液氨储存方式进行了全面经济性对比分析。
    结果 在火电厂绿氨掺烧场景下,管道运输具有经济性好、运输效率高、安全性高等显著优势,是当下最可行的大规模液氨运输方式。根据经济性分析结果并出于安全性考虑,在中压常温与低压降温组合储存方式中,选取的中压常温球罐数量应合理且尽量少,宜为2~3个;研究发现液氨储存存在一个临界时间,本案例的临界时间为5天,当液氨储存时间大于临界时间时建议选用中压常温与低压降温组合储存方式,可以较好地兼顾经济性与安全性;而当液氨储存时间不大于临界时间时,3种储存方式的经济性相差不大,建议选用安全性更高的中压常温储存方式。
    结论 目前亟需制定液氨管道输送相关国家标准,并加快推进火电厂绿氨掺烧示范工程建设工作,助力实现“碳达峰、碳中和”目标。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Ammonia is an effective zero-carbon fuel, and green ammonia co-firing has emerged as one of the key technical pathways for the low-carbon transformation of thermal power plants in China. This approach not only addresses the carbon reduction challenges of thermal power plants but also facilitates the large-scale consumption and long-term storage of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. Consequently, the large-scale, efficient, economical, and safe storage and transportation of liquid ammonia is of paramount importance.
    Methods The advantages and disadvantages of ammonia fuel were analyzed from its properties and energy storage capabilities, and the transportation and storage methods of liquid ammonia were introduced in detail. To improve the existing liquid ammonia storage process, a novel method combining medium-pressure storage at ambient temperature with low-pressure storage at lowered temperature was proposed, effectively leveraging the strengths of both methods. This method offers advantages such as energy and water savings, high safety, and reasonable investment costs. Taking the 10% (by calorific value) green ammonia co-firing project of 2×660 MW units in a coal-fired thermal power plant as a case study, specific technical solutions for liquid ammonia storage and transportation were provided, along with the selection of main equipment design parameters and a comprehensive economic comparison of three liquid ammonia storage methods.
    Results In the scenario of green ammonia co-firing in thermal power plants, pipeline transportation offers significant advantages, including improved economic efficiency, high transportation efficiency, and enhanced safety, making it the most viable large-scale method for liquid ammonia transportation. Based on economic analysis and safety considerations, the proposed method of combining medium-pressure storage at ambient temperature with low-pressure storage at lowered temperature should utilize a minimal number of spherical tanks for medium-pressure storage, ideally 2 to 3. The study identified a critical storage duration of 5 days for liquid ammonia. If storage exceeds this duration, the combined storage method is recommended to better balance economy and safety. Conversely, if storage is within the duration, the economic efficiency of the three storage methods is comparable, and the safer option of medium-pressure storage at ambient temperature is recommended.
    Conclusion Currently, it is imperative to establish Chinese national standards for liquid ammonia pipeline transportation and expedite the development of green ammonia co-firing demonstration projects in thermal power plants to achieve the goals of “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality”.

     

/

返回文章
返回