氢气与天然气站场管道90° 弯管冲蚀磨损行为差异分析

Analysis of erosion wear behavior differences for 90° elbows in hydrogen and natural gas pipeline stations

  • 摘要:
    目的 在能源转型背景下,管道输送介质正在向氢气转变,但现阶段针对氢气携带颗粒造成的管道冲蚀问题的相关研究鲜有涉及。目前国内外氢气站场的建设、运营尚处于起步阶段,考虑到氢气站场管内杂质颗粒数据积累不足,借助天然气站场内已有的杂质颗粒粒径与质量流量数据对站场氢气管道弯管冲蚀问题进行研究,可为氢气管道的安全运行提供有效支撑。
    方法 针对氢气与天然气站场弯管冲蚀磨损的差异性问题,首先基于离散相模型(Discrete Phase Model, DPM),采用 Fluent 软件建立数值模型,对弯径比 1.5、管径为200 mm的管道 90° 弯管冲蚀过程进行模拟,重点研究流动方向、气体组分、气体流速、杂质颗粒直径及质量流量对冲蚀磨损形貌与速率的影响;随后利用用户自定义函数(User-Defined Function, UDF)提取壁面处颗粒碰撞信息,进一步分析碰撞角度、碰撞速度及碰撞频次的耦合作用对冲蚀形貌及冲蚀速率差异的影响。
    结果 冲蚀严重区域主要分布于直管段及弯管出弯段的内、外弧面,且随颗粒斯托克斯数的变化发生位置移动;在纯氢站场中,弯管最大冲蚀速率随流体流速增加呈指数关系增大,随颗粒质量流量增加近似呈线性增长趋势,随杂质颗粒粒径增加则先缓慢增长、后快速增长,呈现双阶段特征;纯氢管道存在 30 μm 的临界粒径,当杂质颗粒粒径超过该临界值后,弯管最大冲蚀速率的增长趋势会显著加快;当管内颗粒物浓度小于 100 mg/m3且粒径小于 10 μm 时,氢气站场内的介质流速可提高至 30 m/s,且不会对管道安全性产生显著影响。
    结论 通过多尺度耦合分析,阐明了氢气管道的冲蚀机制,明确了介质物性与颗粒动力学的交互作用对冲蚀行为的影响规律。该成果不仅可为氢气站场流速与杂质含量的限定标准提供理论参考,有助于降低站内弯管失效风险,还能为氢能基础设施的可靠性设计及相关标准制定奠定理论基础。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective The application of energy pipelines is shifting to the transportation of hydrogen in the context of energy transition, however, research on erosion caused by particles in hydrogen remains limited. At present, the construction and operation of hydrogen pipelines worldwide are still in the early stages. Therefore, no statistical data on impurities inside the pipelines are available.Investigating the erosion of hydrogen pipeline elbows using data on impurity particle size and mass flow in natural gas stations is crucial for ensuring the safe operation of hydrogen pipelines.
    Methods Regarding the difference in erosion wear between hydrogen and natural gas pipeline stations, a numerical model was established using Fluent based on the discrete phase model to simulate the erosion process of the 90° elbow of 200 mm diameter pipelines with a bend-to-diameter ratio of 1.5. The effects of flow direction, gas composition, gas flow velocity, impurity particle diameter, and impurity particle mass flow rate on erosion wear morphology and rate were examined. Additionally, a user-defined function (UDF) was utilized to extract particle collision information at the wall surface, allowing for the analysis of the coupling effects of impact angle, impact velocity, and impact frequency on differences in erosion morphology and rate.
    Results Severe erosion areas were predominantly found in straight pipeline segments and on the inner and outer arc surfaces of the elbow exit segments, shifting with changes in particle Stokes number. In pure hydrogen stations, the maximum erosion rate of the elbow increased exponentially with fluid flow velocity and approximately linearly with mass flow rate. The erosion rate also exhibited a two-stage characteristic, initially increasing slowly before rising rapidly with increasing particle size. When the pipeline transportation medium was hydrogen, the maximum erosion rate of the elbow was significantly greater than that of methane pipelines under the same energy supply intensity, with a critical particle size of 30 μm identified for the pure hydrogen pipeline. Beyond this critical value, the elbow’s maximum erosion rate exhibited a marked increase. Additionally, when the concentration of particulate matter in the pipe was below 100 mg/m³ and particle size was under 10 μm, the flow velocity in the hydrogen station could reach 30 m/s without significantly compromising pipeline safety.
    Conclusion Through multi-scale coupled analysis, the erosion mechanism of hydrogen pipelines has been elucidated, clarifying the influence of the interaction between medium physical properties and particle dynamics on erosion behavior. This research offers a theoretical reference for regulating flow velocity and impurity content in hydrogen stations, reducing the risk of elbow failure, and establishing a foundation for the reliability design and standard formulation of hydrogen energy infrastructure.

     

/

返回文章
返回