王敏聪,侯磊,王雪婷,等. 地下空间储氢技术研究进展与应用展望[J]. 油气储运,2025,44(6):601−620. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.06.001
引用本文: 王敏聪,侯磊,王雪婷,等. 地下空间储氢技术研究进展与应用展望[J]. 油气储运,2025,44(6):601−620. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.06.001
WANG Mincong, HOU Lei, WANG Xueting, et al. Research progress and application prospect of hydrogen storage technology in underground space[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, 44(6): 601−620. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.06.001
Citation: WANG Mincong, HOU Lei, WANG Xueting, et al. Research progress and application prospect of hydrogen storage technology in underground space[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2025, 44(6): 601−620. DOI: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.06.001

地下空间储氢技术研究进展与应用展望

Research progress and application prospect of hydrogen storage technology in underground space

  • 摘要:
    目的 随着“双碳”战略与可持续发展目标的不断推进,氢能作为来源丰富、绿色低碳、应用广泛的二次能源受到广泛关注。地下储氢是实现氢能大规模、长周期储存的有效途径,与国外相比,中国地下储氢研究与建设起步较晚,尚无已建成的地下储氢工程案例。
    方法 围绕地下空间储氢技术展开调研,剖析了盐穴、枯竭油气藏、含水层、衬砌岩洞4种储氢地质体类型的优缺点与储存特征。针对地下储氢技术关键难点与潜在风险点,结合国外氢气地下储存的典型案例,选取枯竭油气藏型与盐穴型两类储氢库为例,系统阐述了地下储氢在地质体完整性、井筒完整性、地球化学反应及微生物反应等方面面临的风险,对比了不同风险对两类典型储氢库的影响。为拓宽地下储氢的应用场景、推进氢能产业协同发展,利用氢场景多元化与地下储氢容量大、周期长、受地质条件限制的特点,探讨了电-氢、电-氢-电、电-氢-甲烷3类用氢场景下的地下储氢适配模式,并对3类应用模式的未来发展潜力进行了展望。
    结果 枯竭油气藏型与盐穴型两类储氢库在实际运行过程中也面临众多风险挑战,但与枯竭油气藏相比,盐穴中氢气沿围岩发生泄漏的风险概率更低,因地球化学反应、微生物反应而产生的氢气损耗量更小。地下空间储氢技术在3类用氢场景中均有适配发展潜力,但现阶段电-氢-电、电-氢-甲烷两种方式存在能量转化效率低、经济成本高等问题。
    结论 地下空间储氢技术在未来氢能大规模应用中具有广阔的市场前景,结合国外地下储氢经验与现有风险难题,发现盐穴型是目前经验技术最成熟、最优质的地下储氢库类型。为建立绿色、高效、低成本的低碳能源体系,宜优先发展以氢气为终端应用的“电-氢”协同模式。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective With the ongoing advancements in the “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” strategy and sustainable development goals, hydrogen energy, as a secondary energy source, has garnered significant attention both in China and internationally, due to its abundant availability, eco-friendliness, and low carbon emissions, along with its wide-ranging applications. Underground hydrogen storage has emerged as an effective method for achieving large-scale and long-term storage of hydrogen energy. In comparison to other countries, China relatively falls behind in its research and development of underground hydrogen storage and currently lacks completed engineering cases of such systems.
    Methods This paper presents investigations into the technology of hydrogen storage in underground spaces, focusing on the advantages and disadvantages of four types of geological bodies used for hydrogen storage: salt caverns, depleted oil and gas reservoirs, aquifers, and lined caverns, along with their respective storage characteristics. The discussion further examines the key challenges and potential risks associated with underground hydrogen storage, particularly in the context of depleted oil and gas reservoirs and salt caverns, based on typical cases from abroad. A systematic analysis of the risks encountered in this field is provided, specifically addressing geological body integrity, wellbore integrity, geochemical reactions, and microbial interactions. The impacts of these various risks on the two selected types of hydrogen storage are compared. Moreover, the paper explores adaptation models for underground hydrogen storage across three application scenarios: electricity-hydrogen, electricity-hydrogen-electricity, and electricity-hydrogen-methane. This analysis considers the diversity of hydrogen application scenarios and the characteristics of underground hydrogen storage, such as large capacities, long durations, and geological constraints, with the aim of broadening application scenarios and promoting the coordinated development of the hydrogen energy sector. Furthermore, the potential for future development of these three application models is discussed.
    Results Hydrogen storage in depleted oil and gas reservoirs and salt caverns encounters various risks and challenges during actual operation. However, compared to depleted oil and gas reservoirs, salt caverns pose a lower risk of hydrogen leakage through the surrounding rock and result in smaller hydrogen losses due to geochemical and microbial reactions. The underground hydrogen storage technology shows potential for adaptive development across the three hydrogen application scenarios examined. Nevertheless, the two models—electricity-hydrogen-electricity and electricity-hydrogen-methane—currently face bottlenecks, such as low energy conversion efficiencies and high economic costs.
    Conclusion The technology of hydrogen storage in underground spaces holds significant market potential for the large-scale application of hydrogen energy in the future. Considering foreign experience of underground hydrogen storage and the identified risks and challenges, salt caverns can be regarded as the most mature and optimal option for underground hydrogen storage available today. Priority should be given to developing the “electricity-hydrogen” coordinated model, with hydrogen as the terminal application, to establish green, efficient, and cost-effective low-carbon energy systems.

     

/

返回文章
返回